Difference between revisions of "Modification:Sciento-2019-0015"
Paul Patton (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Authors List=Paul Patton, | |Authors List=Paul Patton, | ||
|Resource=Patton (2019) | |Resource=Patton (2019) | ||
| − | |Preamble= | + | |Preamble=Currently the only entity taken to be capable of bearing a mosaic in scientonomy is a [[Epistemic Agents - Communities (Barseghyan-2015)|community]] [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2105)|pp. 43-52]] |
|To Accept=Epistemic Agents - Communities and Individuals (Patton-2019), | |To Accept=Epistemic Agents - Communities and Individuals (Patton-2019), | ||
|To Reject=Epistemic Agents - Communities (Barseghyan-2015), | |To Reject=Epistemic Agents - Communities (Barseghyan-2015), | ||
Revision as of 02:10, 3 February 2020
Accept that there are two types of epistemic agents – individual and communal. Also accept the question of applicability of the laws of scientific change to individuals as a legitimate topic of scientonomic inquiry.
The modification was suggested to Scientonomy community by Paul Patton on 26 December 2019.1 The modification was accepted on 10 January 2022.
Contents
Preamble
Currently the only entity taken to be capable of bearing a mosaic in scientonomy is a community 2pp. 43-52
Modification
Theories To Accept
- Individual Epistemic Agent Exists: There is such a thing as an individual epistemic agent.
- Individual Epistemic Agent Is a Subtype of Epistemic Agent (Patton-2019): Individual Epistemic Agent is a subtype of Epistemic Agent, i.e. epistemic agent is a supertype of individual epistemic agent.
Questions To Accept
- Applicability of the Laws of Scientific Change to Individuals: Do the scientonomic laws apply to individual epistemic agents?
Questions Answered
This modification attempts to answer the following question(s):
- Subtypes of Epistemic Agent: What are the subtypes of an epistemic agent?
- Existence of Individual Epistemic Agent: Does an individual epistemic agent exist?
- Supertypes of Individual Epistemic Agent: What are the supertypes of an individual epistemic agent?
Verdict
The modification was accepted on 10 January 2022. It was agreed during seminar discussions that the "modification aims to codify our de facto communal stance towards the ontology of epistemic agents".c1 This is confirmed by the fact that several recent articles take this ontology of epistemic agents for granted (e.g., Barseghyan and Levesley (2021), Machado-Marques and Patton (2021)).34 Even as early as 2017, several of Loiselle's examples of authority delegation concern individual experts (see Loiselle (2017)).5
Click on the Discussion tab for comments.
References
- ^ Patton, Paul. (2019) Epistemic Tools and Epistemic Agents in Scientonomy. Scientonomy 3, 63-89. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/33621.
- ^ Barseghyan (2105)
- ^ Barseghyan, Hakob and Levesley, Nichole. (2021) Question Dynamics. Scientonomy 4, 1-19. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/37120.
- ^ Machado-Marques, Sarah and Patton, Paul. (2021) Scientific Error and Error Handling. Scientonomy 4, 21-39. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/37121.
- ^ Loiselle, Mirka. (2017) Multiple Authority Delegation in Art Authentication. Scientonomy 1, 41-53. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/28233.
