Accept that there are two types of epistemic agents – individual and communal. Also accept the question of applicability of the laws of scientific change to individuals as a legitimate topic of scientonomic inquiry.
In scientonomy, communities have been taken as the primary focus of interest for understanding the process of scientific change.2 Currently, they are the only entity taken to be capable of bearing a mosaic. The currently accepted definition of authority delegation3 takes it to be a relationship between communities. Yet, at the same time, Loiselle's own examples reveal that an individual can be the subject of authority delegation.4 There seem to be many other instances, such as within individual scientific research groups, where authority is delegated to an individual.1 Within the context of the new proposed definition of epistemic agent, there seems no good reason to reserve this status solely for communities. One may acknowledge that there are both communal and individual epistemic agents while at the same time recognizing that the two types of epistemic agents need not be similar in all respects. In particular, it is not yet clear whether the processes by which individuals acting independently chose their epistemic stances adhere to the same laws of scientific change.
Theories To Accept
- Epistemic Agents - Communities and Individuals (Patton-2019): There are two types of epistemic agents – individual and communal.
Theories To Reject
- Epistemic Agents - Communities (Barseghyan-2015): Only a community can be the bearer of a scientific mosaic.
Questions To Accept
- Applicability of the Laws of Scientific Change to Individuals: Do the scientonomic laws apply to individual epistemic agents?
This modification attempts to answer the following question(s):
- Epistemic Agents: Who can be a bearer of a mosaic? Can a community be a bearer of a mosaic? Can an individual be a bearer of a mosaic? Can an instrument be a bearer of a mosaic?
The modification is currently being evaluated; a verdict is pending.
Click on the Discussion tab for comments.
- Patton, Paul. (2019) Epistemic Tools and Epistemic Agents in Scientonomy. Scientonomy 3, 63-89. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/33621.
- Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.
- Overgaard, Nicholas and Loiselle, Mirka. (2016) Authority Delegation. Scientonomy 1, 11-18. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/27065.
- Loiselle, Mirka. (2017) Multiple Authority Delegation in Art Authentication. Scientonomy 1, 41-53. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/28233.