Difference between revisions of "Modification:Sciento-2023-0003"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
 
|Modification=
 
|Modification=
 
|To Accept=Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), Norm Rejection theorem (Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), Question Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), Question Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Levesley-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023)
 
|To Accept=Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), Norm Rejection theorem (Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), Question Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), Question Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Levesley-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023), Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023)
|Parent Modifications=Modification:Sciento-2024-0001
+
|Parent Modifications=
 
|Automatic=No
 
|Automatic=No
 
|Verdict=Open
 
|Verdict=Open

Revision as of 14:30, 22 February 2024

Accept that the first law and its corollaries are tautologies. Also accept that the rejection theorems are tautologies.

The modification was suggested to Scientonomy community by Aayu Pandey on 28 December 2023.1 This modification presupposes the acceptance of Sciento-2024-0001. The modification is currently being evaluated; a verdict is pending.

Preamble

There are a number of scenarios of theory replacement allowed by the first law, such as the replacement by negation, the replacement by an answer to a different question, the replacement that involves the rejection of the question, and the replacement by a higher-order proposition. The only scenario that the first law forbids is that of the rejection without any replacement whatsoever, as in the cases of element decay. The very existence of the phenomenon of element decay, therefore, poses a problem for the first law: if element decay is forbidden by the first law, then does this imply that the first law has been falsified? This brought us to our dilemma: either (1) exclude the cases of rejection without replacement from the scope of scientonomy and admit that the first law is a tautology or (2) include the cases of rejection without replacement into the scope of scientonomy and admit that such cases present a serious anomaly for the first law.

The suggestion is to opt for the first option, as it seems the lesser of two evils. One consideration in support of this option, is that the procedure of limiting the scope is ubiquitous in many other fields of inquiry; thus, there is nothing inherently vicious in excluding certain non-epistemic phenomena (such as element decay) from the scope of our discipline. Also, a parallel can be drawn between the scientonomic first law and Newton’s first law: while the latter too has been considered tautological, not many have thought that it is necessarily a serious problem. Thus, the tautological nature of our first law is not inevitably problematic.

Modification

Theories To Accept

Questions Answered

This modification attempts to answer the following question(s):

Verdict

The modification is currently being evaluated; a verdict is pending.

Click on the Discussion tab for comments.

References

  1. ^  Pandey, Aayu. (2023) Dilemma of the First Law. Scientonomy 5, 25-46. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/42258.