Difference between revisions of "Modification:Sciento-2024-0002"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Modification |Community=Community:Scientonomy |Acronym=Sciento |Summary=Accept a list of necessary indicators of ''theory decay''. |Date Suggested Year=2024 |Date Suggested...")
(No difference)

Revision as of 12:33, 22 February 2024

Accept a list of necessary indicators of theory decay.

The modification was suggested to Scientonomy community by Sanghoon Oh on 21 February 2024.1 The modification is currently being evaluated; a verdict is pending.

Preamble

To identify historical cases of theory decay, we need a list of historical indicators. It seems that to legitimately claim that episode x involved theory decay, we must be able to show that we are dealing with a continuous epistemic agent that existed throughout the transition in question, that there was a change from theory acceptance to unacceptance, and that the unacceptance took place without any assessment by that agent.

Modification

Accept the following as necessary indicators of theory decay:

  • Agent Continuity: there should be historical evidence that the agent in question continuously existed during the time period under study.
  • Change from Theory Acceptance to Unacceptance: there should be clear indications of a theory being accepted at some point and unaccepted at some later point.
  • Theory Unacceptance Without Assessment: there should be clear evidence that the theory became unaccepted without any theoretical assessment on the part of the agent.

Verdict

The modification is currently being evaluated; a verdict is pending.

Click on the Discussion tab for comments.

References

  1. ^  Oh, Sanghoon. (2021) Element Decay. Scientonomy 4, 41-58. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/37122.