Difference between revisions of "Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method (Barseghyan-2015)"
Paul Patton (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Theory |Title=Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method |Theory Type=Descriptive |Formulation Text=Scientonomy does not postulate the existence of a u...") |
Paul Patton (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Theory Type=Descriptive | |Theory Type=Descriptive | ||
|Formulation Text=Scientonomy does not postulate the existence of a universal and unchanging method of science; thus the fact that methods of science are changeable is not detrimental to the prospects of scientonomy. | |Formulation Text=Scientonomy does not postulate the existence of a universal and unchanging method of science; thus the fact that methods of science are changeable is not detrimental to the prospects of scientonomy. | ||
− | |Topic=Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from | + | |Topic=Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method |
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, | |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, | ||
|Formulated Year=2015 | |Formulated Year=2015 |
Latest revision as of 01:14, 6 December 2018
This is an answer to the question Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method that states "Scientonomy does not postulate the existence of a universal and unchanging method of science; thus the fact that methods of science are changeable is not detrimental to the prospects of scientonomy."
Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method was formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015.1 It is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available answer to the question.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | The theorem became de facto accepted by the community at that time together with the whole theory of scientific change. | Yes |
Question Answered
Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method (Barseghyan-2015) is an attempt to answer the following question: How can there be scientonomy if the methods of science are changeable?
See Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method for more details.
Description
ToDo
Reasons
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
Questions About This Theory
There are no higher-order questions concerning this theory.
If a question about this theory is missing, please add it here.
References
- ^ Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.