Difference between revisions of "Scientonomy Seminar"
(Created page with "Scientonomy seminar is held annually by the Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science, University of Toronto. The seminar usually starts in January and ends in April...") |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Scientonomy seminar is held annually by the Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science, University of Toronto. The seminar usually starts in January and ends in April consisting of 11 discussion sessions. The main goal of the seminar is to scrutinize different aspects of | + | Scientonomy seminar is held annually by [http://hps.utoronto.ca/ the Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science], University of Toronto. The seminar usually starts in January and ends in April consisting of 11 discussion sessions. The main goal of the seminar is to scrutinize different aspects of our current [[Scientonomy|scientonomic knowledge]] and formulate as many open questions as possible. As opposed to the [[Scientonomy Workshop|workshop]] format, the seminar's primary objective is unearthing the drawbacks of our current scientonomic knowledge, i.e. understanding '''what does not work'''. While the seminar also often generates interesting ideas on how this or that problem can be solved, the primary outcome of the seminar is the list of open questions for future research. |
==History== | ==History== | ||
The seminar was first designed and run by Hakob Barseghyan in 2013. Originally, the seminar had a wider focus and tried to accomplish the two following tasks: | The seminar was first designed and run by Hakob Barseghyan in 2013. Originally, the seminar had a wider focus and tried to accomplish the two following tasks: | ||
| − | * scrutinizing each aspect of the current theory and understanding what is not working; | + | * '''scrutinizing''' each aspect of the current theory and understanding what is not working; |
| − | * '''generating | + | * '''generating''' ideas on how the theory can be improved by finding solutions to topical issues. |
| − | It took the seminar three full iterations before it became clear that | + | |
| + | It took the seminar three full iterations before it became clear that it should be mainly focusing on the former task, i.e. on compiling a list of open questions for future research. As for finding solutions to open questions, it was appreciated that the seminar is not the best format for it. Solutions to open problems require proper research papers; only when an idea is published can the community begin to appraise it and decide whether it is acceptable or not. This idea is in the foundation of the [[Journal of Scientonomy]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Although the previous iterations of the seminar produced a number of interesting open questions, the seminar of 2016 was the first to aim directly at producing open questions. It was the first year when a comprehensive list of open questions was generated. | ||
==Present== | ==Present== | ||
| Line 11: | Line 14: | ||
If a question raises a sufficient level of interest or disagreement, it is considered an open question. Clearly, this criterion is somewhat vague and not very strict; as a result, the list of open questions can sometimes include questions ,the answers to which may appear trivial. However, this is done on purpose; the assumption here is that an occasional inclusion of a trivial question outweighs the risk of missing an important question. | If a question raises a sufficient level of interest or disagreement, it is considered an open question. Clearly, this criterion is somewhat vague and not very strict; as a result, the list of open questions can sometimes include questions ,the answers to which may appear trivial. However, this is done on purpose; the assumption here is that an occasional inclusion of a trivial question outweighs the risk of missing an important question. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Open Questions== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Open Questions 2016|The list of open questions generated in the seminar of 2016.]] | ||
==Related Articles== | ==Related Articles== | ||
Revision as of 22:34, 11 July 2016
Scientonomy seminar is held annually by the Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science, University of Toronto. The seminar usually starts in January and ends in April consisting of 11 discussion sessions. The main goal of the seminar is to scrutinize different aspects of our current scientonomic knowledge and formulate as many open questions as possible. As opposed to the workshop format, the seminar's primary objective is unearthing the drawbacks of our current scientonomic knowledge, i.e. understanding what does not work. While the seminar also often generates interesting ideas on how this or that problem can be solved, the primary outcome of the seminar is the list of open questions for future research.
History
The seminar was first designed and run by Hakob Barseghyan in 2013. Originally, the seminar had a wider focus and tried to accomplish the two following tasks:
- scrutinizing each aspect of the current theory and understanding what is not working;
- generating ideas on how the theory can be improved by finding solutions to topical issues.
It took the seminar three full iterations before it became clear that it should be mainly focusing on the former task, i.e. on compiling a list of open questions for future research. As for finding solutions to open questions, it was appreciated that the seminar is not the best format for it. Solutions to open problems require proper research papers; only when an idea is published can the community begin to appraise it and decide whether it is acceptable or not. This idea is in the foundation of the Journal of Scientonomy.
Although the previous iterations of the seminar produced a number of interesting open questions, the seminar of 2016 was the first to aim directly at producing open questions. It was the first year when a comprehensive list of open questions was generated.
Present
The seminar currently takes place at the beginning of every year and focuses on the task of unearthing the drawbacks of our current scientonomic knowledge.
If a question raises a sufficient level of interest or disagreement, it is considered an open question. Clearly, this criterion is somewhat vague and not very strict; as a result, the list of open questions can sometimes include questions ,the answers to which may appear trivial. However, this is done on purpose; the assumption here is that an occasional inclusion of a trivial question outweighs the risk of missing an important question.
Open Questions
The list of open questions generated in the seminar of 2016.
