Difference between revisions of "Scientonomy Seminar 2017"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Scientonomy Seminar |Title=The fifth annual IHPST seminar on the theory of scientific change |Start Year=2016 |Start Month=January |Start Day=6 |End Year=2016 |End Month=Mar...") |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Scientonomy Seminar | {{Scientonomy Seminar | ||
|Title=The fifth annual IHPST seminar on the theory of scientific change | |Title=The fifth annual IHPST seminar on the theory of scientific change | ||
| − | |Start Year= | + | |Start Year=2017 |
|Start Month=January | |Start Month=January | ||
|Start Day=6 | |Start Day=6 | ||
| − | |End Year= | + | |End Year=2017 |
|End Month=March | |End Month=March | ||
|End Day=31 | |End Day=31 | ||
| − | |Participants List=Nicholas Overgaard, Paul Patton, Jacob MacKinnon, Jacqueline Sereda, Gregory Rupik, Hakob Barseghyan, | + | |Participants List=Nicholas Overgaard, Paul Patton, Jacob MacKinnon, Jacqueline Sereda, Gregory Rupik, Hakob Barseghyan, Markus Alliksaar, Calahan Janik-Jones, William Rawleigh, Terese Pierre, Nadezhda Woinowsky-Krieger, Juan Serrano Reyes, Karl Loszak, Maxim Mirkin, |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:59, 15 April 2017
| Title | The fifth annual IHPST seminar on the theory of scientific change |
|---|---|
| Start Date | 6 January 2017 |
| End Date | 31 March 2017 |
Questions Raised
- Applicability of Scientonomy to Theories as Models: Is the theory of scientific change applicable to theories construed as sets of models, or in ways that reject their purely formal characterization?
- Applicability of the Laws of Scientific Change: To which mosaics do the laws of scientific change apply? Do they apply only to scientific communities, to all epistemic communities, or all communities whatsoever (including non-epistemic communities)? Do these patterns emerge and exist in communities who gather together to study the world?
- Delegation of Authority to Past Communities: Is it possible for a community to delegate authority to a community that no longer exists? Can a community delegate authority to a past expert?
- Deriving Methods from an Empty Set: Does the possibility of a method being derived from an empty set pose a problem for the current formulation of the third law? Can we conceive of a situation in which a method is derived from an empty subset?
- Implementation vs. Employment of Methods: Is there a difference between implementation and employment of a method? Is the mechanism of implementation the same as the mechanism of employment?
- Role of Non-Social and Environmental Factors in Scientific Change: In addition to interactions between people in a community, what role do interactions between people and their natural, non-social environment have on the process of scientific change?
- Role of Used Theories in Method Employment: Does the third law allow for methods to be deductive consequences of used theories?
- The Necessity of Language in Community: Is a shared language, or propositional code, presupposed by the existence of an epistemic community?
Participants
Calahan Janik-Jones
Gregory Rupik
Hakob Barseghyan
Jacob MacKinnon
Jacqueline Sereda
Juan Serrano Reyes
Karl Loszak
Markus Alliksaar
Maxim Mirkin
Nadezhda Woinowsky-Krieger
Nicholas Overgaard
Paul Patton
Terese Pierre
William Rawleigh
