Difference between revisions of "The Theory of Scientific Change"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Paul Patton (talk | contribs) |
Paul Patton (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
== Open Questions == | == Open Questions == | ||
| + | •Should technological knowledge be formulated as “accepted” or “useful” beliefs. (Sean Cohmer, 2015). | ||
| + | |||
• The Asynchronism of Method Employment theorem says that employment of methods is not always necessarily a result of the acceptance of new theories. But surely all methods (even concrete implementations of abstract requirements) are employed simultaneously with the acceptance of a descriptive proposition which states that that method is effective. Does this poses a challenge towards the Asynchronism of Method Employment theorem? (Mirka Loiselle, 2016) | • The Asynchronism of Method Employment theorem says that employment of methods is not always necessarily a result of the acceptance of new theories. But surely all methods (even concrete implementations of abstract requirements) are employed simultaneously with the acceptance of a descriptive proposition which states that that method is effective. Does this poses a challenge towards the Asynchronism of Method Employment theorem? (Mirka Loiselle, 2016) | ||
Revision as of 16:56, 29 August 2016
References
- a b c d e f g h i j k l Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.
- ^ Sebastien, Zoe. (2016) The Status of Normative Propositions in the Theory of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 1, 1-9. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/26947.
- a b Laudan (1984)
- ^ Sebastian(2016)
- ^ Kuhn (1977)
- a b c d e Barseghyan(2015)
