Compatibility Criteria (Barseghyan-2015)
A definition of Compatibility Criteria that states "Criteria for determining whether two theories are compatible or incompatible."
|Community||Accepted From||Acceptance Indicators||Still Accepted||Accepted Until||Rejection Indicators|
|Scientonomy||1 January 2016||The definition became de facto accepted by the community at that time together with the whole theory of scientific change.||No||11 October 2020||The definition became rejected as a result of the acceptance of the respective suggested modification.|
Suggestions To Reject
|Modification||Community||Date Suggested||Summary||Verdict||Verdict Rationale||Date Assessed|
|Sciento-2018-0017||Scientonomy||28 January 2018||Accept the new definition of compatibility criteria as criteria for determining whether two elements are compatible or incompatible.||Accepted||The discussions concerning this modification took place mostly online, but primarily outside of this encyclopedia. There is a communal agreement that the modification is to be accepted as it fixes "an obvious drawback of [Barseghyan's] original definition".c1 Since "compatibility is a stance that can be taken towards methods, theories, and questions alike"c2 it is agreed that we need a definition that is applicable to all epistemic elements, not merely theories. It was also noted that the new definition has the advantage of being "neutral to the the addition of new epistemic elements to the scientonomic ontology".c3||11 October 2020|
Compatibility Criteria (Barseghyan-2015) is an attempt to answer the following question: What is compatibility criteria? How should it be defined?
See Compatibility Criteria for more details.
Like demarcation and acceptance criteria, compatibility criteria can be part of a community's employed method. The community employs these criteria to determine whether two theories are mutually compatible or incompatible, i.e. whether they can be simultaneously part of the community's mosaic. Different communities can have different compatibility criteria. While some communities may opt to employ the logical law of noncontradiction as their criterion of compatibility, other communities may be more tolerant towards logical inconsistencies. According to Barseghyan, the fact that these days scientists "often simultaneously accept theories which strictly speaking logically contradict each other is a good indication that the actual criteria of compatibility employed by the scientific community might be quite different from the classical logical law of noncontradiction".1 For example, this is apparent in the case of general relativity vs. quantum physics where both theories are accepted as the best available descriptions of their respective domains (i.e. they are considered compatible), but are known to be in conflict when applied simultaneously to such objects as black holes.
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
- Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.