Logical Presupposition

What is logical presupposition? How should it be defined?

While theories are answers to questions, questions presuppose theories. The concept of logical presupposition is meant to denote the logical (as opposed to epistemic) aspect of the relation of presupposition.

In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Hakob Barseghyan and Nichole Levesley in 2021. The term is currently accepted by Scientonomy community.

In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is:

• A theory is said to be a logical presupposition of a question, iff the theory is logically entailed by any direct answer to the question.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record of the Term

Here is the complete acceptance record of this term (it includes all the instances when the term was accepted as a part of a community's taxonomy):

Community	Accepted From	Acceptance Indicators	Still Accepted	Accepted Until	Rejection Indicators
Scientonomy	1 August 2021	This is when Barseghyan and Levesley's Question Dynamics that offered a definition of the term was published. This is a good indication that the question of how the term is to be defined is considered legitimate by the community.	Yes

All Definitions

The following definitions of logical presupposition the term have been suggested:

Theory	Formulation	Formulated In
Logical Presupposition (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021)	A theory is said to be a logical presupposition of a question, iff the theory is logically entailed by any direct answer to the question.	2021

If a definition of this term is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Definitions

The following definitions of logical presupposition have been accepted:

Community	Theory	Formulation	Accepted From	Accepted Until
Scientonomy	Logical Presupposition (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021)	A theory is said to be a logical presupposition of a question, iff the theory is logically entailed by any direct answer to the question.	6 February 2023

Suggested Modifications

Here is a list of modifications concerning the definitions of logical presupposition:

Modification	Community	Date Suggested	Summary	Date Assessed	Verdict	Verdict Rationale
Sciento-2021-0001	Scientonomy	1 August 2021	Accept the definitions of logical presupposition and epistemic presupposition.	6 February 2023	Accepted	It was emphasized that the "modification is appealing given the presence of questions as a basic class of epistemic element in our ontology and the need to reference their presuppositions in observational scientonomy alongside proposed laws concerning questions in theoretical scientonomy".c1 The commentators agreed that "an epistemic agent could plausibly accept all the epistemic presuppositions without necessarily accepting all the logical presuppositions".c2 They also also noted that "accepting separate definitions of logical presupposition and epistemic presupposition would improve the specificity of our communal knowledge - and perhaps our visualization capabilities".c3 Specifically, "there is clear value in distinguishing logical and epistemic presuppositions in scientonomic diagrams".c4 Finally, the commentators highlighted the importance of the distinction for the law of question acceptance.c5 c6

Current Definition

In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is Logical Presupposition (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021).

Logical Presupposition (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021) states: "A theory is said to be a logical presupposition of a question, iff the theory is logically entailed by any direct answer to the question."

TODO: Nikki add a description

Ontology

Existence

In Scientonomy, it is currently accepted that "There is such a thing as a logical presupposition."

Subtypes

In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted subtypes of Logical Presupposition.

Supertypes

In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted supertypes of Logical Presupposition.

If a question concerning the ontology of a logical presupposition is missing, please add it here.

Dynamics

If a question concerning the dynamics of a logical presupposition is missing, please add it here.