Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
6 bytes removed ,  15:05, 28 September 2016
no edit summary
{{Topic
|Question=What is the nature of '''nature of theory appraisal'''? Does actual '''theory assessment''' concern an individual theory taken in isolation from other theories?
|Topic Type=Descriptive
|Description='''Theory appraisal''' refers to how we assess a theory to determine whether to accept it. From ancient times up until the mid-twentieth century, it was widely supposed that theories were appraised in isolation from one another; a position known as '''absolute appraisal'''. Once fallibilism became widely accepted, it was suggested instead that theory appraisal is a '''comparative''' matter, in which the relative merits of competing theories were assessed. '''Contextual appraisal''' contends that a theory is assessed only in relation to the entire mosaic of accepted theories and employed methods. For the historian, several elements must be considered in order to avoid committing anachronisms.
2,020

edits

Navigation menu