The Law of Norm Employment (Rawleigh-2022)

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search

An attempt to answer the question of Mechanism of Norm Employment which states "A norm becomes employed only if it is derivable from a non-empty subset of other elements of the mosaic."

The Law of Norm Employment (Rawleigh-2022).png

The Law of Norm Employment was formulated by William Rawleigh in 2022.1

History

Acceptance Record

This theory has never been accepted.

Suggestions To Accept

Here are all the modifications where the acceptance of this theory has been suggested:
ModificationCommunityDate SuggestedSummaryVerdictVerdict RationaleDate Assessed
Sciento-2022-0002Scientonomy28 February 2022Accept the new law of norm employment that fixes some of the issues of the current law of method employment and makes it applicable to norms of all types.Open

Question Answered

The Law of Norm Employment (Rawleigh-2022) is an attempt to answer the following question: How do norms become employed by an epistemic agent?

See Mechanism of Norm Employment for more details.

Description

Sebastien's law of method employment faces several problems. Foremost among these is that it is based on an outdated ontology that assumes that methods of theory evaluation are a fundamental epistemic element. After the acceptance of Barseghyan’s proposal that methods be subsumed under the category of normative theories, the third law no longer exhaustively covers all situations cases of employment. In its present form it is limited to methods, though there is no reason to think that the mechanism by which a method is employed is any different than the mechanism by which any other norm is employed.

In addition, Sebastien's formulation of the third law uses the term deducible, which currently lacks a scientonomic definition. We do not currently know what it means for something to be deducible, what the criteria of deducibility would be, or whether the conditions of deducibility would be part of the first-order theories of the mosaic or part of the second-order theories that range over the mosaic.

The third issue with Sebastien's formulation is that, with the acceptance of questions into the epistemic elements of the ontology of scientific change, the elements of the mosaic are now more expansive than just theories and subtypes of theories. This means that there is a plausible situation in which norms could potentially be derived – at least in part – from questions, which means that a formulation of the third law that excludes questions would fail to comprehensively describe all cases of norm employment.

The new law of norm employment aims to remedy all three of these issues:

  • the formulation of the covers all norms rather than only methods;
  • it replaces a deducible with derivable, which in the context of mathematical model theory simply means to be semantically entailed, and thus can potentially include non-deductive inferences (e.g. inductive, abductive);
  • it replaces a specific enumeration of epistemic elements with a general "elements of the mosaic".

This definition also offers the slight clarification that derivability strictly deals with derivation from a finite number of other elements.


Reasons

No reasons are indicated for this theory.

References

  1. ^  Rawleigh, William. (2022) Reconceiving Scientific Mosaics: A New Formalization for Theoretical Scientonomy. In Barseghyan et al. (Eds.) (2022), 83-103.