Edit this Record: Feyerabend (1976b)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups: Users, editor.


Indicate the title of the resource, by capitalizing the nouns, verb, adjectives, and adverbs. E.g. Beyond Positivism and Relativism. NOTE: No formatting is allowed here.

Resource Type:

Indicate what kind of a resource this is.


Indicate all the authors of the resource. For collections, indicate all the editors.

Add a New Author

Enter the year when the resource was published.


Indicate the publisher of the resource.


If the resource has an ISBN, indicate it here. NOTE: do NOT include any hyphens, e.g. 0-8133-2468-8 should be entered as 0813324688.

In Collection:

Select the collection where this article was published. If the collection is not in the list, please add its bibliographic record first and then add the record for this article.


Enter the name of the journal where this article was published. If the journal has a page in this encyclopedia, a link to that page can be added by means of double square brackets in the usual wiki style.


Indicate the volume of the journal issue.


Indicate the number of the journal issue.


Enter the page numbers. NOTE: Do not include "p." or "pp." - indicate the numbers only, e.g. "1-34".

Cover Image:

For books and collections, upload the photo of the cover. For articles, upload the image of the first page (optional).

Upload file

If this bibliographic resource has an abstract, copy and paste it here. If not, please provide a short outline of the main ideas presented in the resource.

Historical Context:

Outline the historical context for this publication. What major questions was the community of the time engaged with? What were some of the accepted views that this publication came to respond to?


Provide a synoptic content by focusing on the major contribution related to the field.


Indicate the major points of criticism leveled at this publication. Who would disagree with the points raised in this publication and why?


If this is an open access online resource, enter its URL. NOTE: Only use this field if the link can be freely accessed by any user. Otherwise, leave this field empty. E.g. JSTOR links are NOT acceptable, as they can only be accessed by JSTOR subscribers.


If the resource has a DOI, enter it here.

YouTube Video