Difference between revisions of "Mechanism of Discipline Acceptance"
Paul Patton (talk | contribs) |
Paul Patton (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|History= | |History= | ||
|Current View= | |Current View= | ||
− | |Related Topics=Discipline, Discipline Acceptance | + | |Related Topics=Discipline, Discipline Acceptance, Mechanism of Question Acceptance, Mechanism of Theory Acceptance, Question Acceptance, Theory Acceptance |
|Page Status=Stub | |Page Status=Stub | ||
|Editor Notes= | |Editor Notes= | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 19:30, 3 August 2021
What is the mechanism of discipline acceptance? How do disciplines become accepted?
Most epistemic communities classify knowledge into categories. Some epistemic communities organize subcommunities devoted to expanding particular categories of knowledge. Disciplines and disciplinary boundaries are ubiquitous features of modern science. Scientonomy has posited mechanisms of theory and question acceptance. How do new disciplines arise? Can they be said to be accepted by an epistemic agent, much as theories and questions are? If disciplines can become accepted then how do they become accepted? What, if any, is the relationship between the mechanisms by which theories and questions are accepted, and those by which disciplines are? All of these are critically important questions in theoretical scientonomy.
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Paul Patton and Cyrus Al-Zayadi in 2021.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
All Theories
If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
Suggested Modifications
Current View
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Related Topics
This question is a subquestion of Mechanism of Scientific Change.
This topic is also related to the following topic(s):