Difference between revisions of "Modification:Sciento-2017-0013"
Paul Patton (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|Date Suggested Day=19 | |Date Suggested Day=19 | ||
|Date Suggested Approximate=No | |Date Suggested Approximate=No | ||
| − | |Authors List=Nicholas Overgaard | + | |Authors List=Nicholas Overgaard |
|Resource=Overgaard (2017) | |Resource=Overgaard (2017) | ||
|Preamble=It is obvious that communities can consist of other communities, i.e. subcommunities. For instance, the University of Toronto can be treated as a community. There are many subcommunities within this large community, such as the Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science (IHPST). The community of scientonomists can be thought of as a subcommunity within the community of the IHPST. While clearly part of larger communities, the community of scientonomists has its own collective intentionality and, therefore, qualifies as a community. Thus, it is important to accept that communities can consist of other communities. | |Preamble=It is obvious that communities can consist of other communities, i.e. subcommunities. For instance, the University of Toronto can be treated as a community. There are many subcommunities within this large community, such as the Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science (IHPST). The community of scientonomists can be thought of as a subcommunity within the community of the IHPST. While clearly part of larger communities, the community of scientonomists has its own collective intentionality and, therefore, qualifies as a community. Thus, it is important to accept that communities can consist of other communities. | ||
| − | |To Accept= | + | |Modification= |
| − | |Parent Modifications=Modification:Sciento-2017-0012 | + | |To Accept=Community Can Have Subcommunities (Overgaard-2017) |
| + | |Parent Modifications=Modification:Sciento-2017-0012 | ||
|Automatic=No | |Automatic=No | ||
|Verdict=Open | |Verdict=Open | ||
| + | |Date Assessed Year= | ||
| + | |Date Assessed Month= | ||
| + | |Date Assessed Day= | ||
|Date Assessed Approximate=No | |Date Assessed Approximate=No | ||
| + | |Verdict Rationale= | ||
| + | |Superseded By= | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:46, 15 January 2023
Accept that communities can consist of other communities, i.e. that there is such a thing as a sub-community.
The modification was suggested to Scientonomy community by Nicholas Overgaard on 19 May 2017.1 This modification presupposes the acceptance of Sciento-2017-0012. The modification is currently being evaluated; a verdict is pending.
Preamble
It is obvious that communities can consist of other communities, i.e. subcommunities. For instance, the University of Toronto can be treated as a community. There are many subcommunities within this large community, such as the Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science (IHPST). The community of scientonomists can be thought of as a subcommunity within the community of the IHPST. While clearly part of larger communities, the community of scientonomists has its own collective intentionality and, therefore, qualifies as a community. Thus, it is important to accept that communities can consist of other communities.
Modification
Theories To Accept
- Community Can Have Subcommunities (Overgaard-2017): A community can consist of other communities.
.png)
Questions Answered
This modification attempts to answer the following question(s):
- Associations of Community: How is the class of community associated with other classes (and itself)? What aggregation, composition, or other association relations can exist between communities, as well as between a community and instances of other classes?
Verdict
The modification is currently being evaluated; a verdict is pending.
Click on the Discussion tab for comments.
References
- ^ Overgaard, Nicholas. (2017) A Taxonomy for the Social Agents of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 1, 55-62. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/28234.
