Difference between revisions of "Non-Empty Mosaic theorem (Barseghyan-2015)"
Izzy Friesen (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Theory | {{Theory | ||
| + | |Topic=Necessary Elements | ||
| + | |Theory Type=Descriptive | ||
| + | |Subject= | ||
| + | |Predicate= | ||
|Title=Non-Empty Mosaic theorem | |Title=Non-Empty Mosaic theorem | ||
| − | | | + | |Alternate Titles= |
| − | |Formulation Text=In order for the process of scientific change to be possible, the mosaic must necessarily contain at least one element. | + | |Title Formula= |
| − | | | + | |Text Formula= |
| − | + | |Formulation Text=In order for the process of scientific change to be possible, the mosaic must necessarily contain at least one element. That is, scientific change is impossible in an empty mosaic. | |
| + | |Object= | ||
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, | |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, | ||
|Formulated Year=2015 | |Formulated Year=2015 | ||
| + | |Formulation File=Non-empty-mosaic-theorem-box-only.jpg | ||
|Description=The non-empty [[Scientific Mosaic|mosaic]] theorem asserts that in order for a process of [[Scientific Change|scientific change]] to be possible, the mosaic must necessarily contain at least one element. Scientific change is impossible in an empty mosaic. It can be deduced from the [[The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)|second law]], which asserts that in order to become accepted into the mosaic, a [[Theory|theory]] is assessed by the [[Method|method]] actually employed at the time, and the [[The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015)|third law]], which asserts that a method becomes employed only when it is deducible from other employed methods and accepted theories of the time.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 226]] | |Description=The non-empty [[Scientific Mosaic|mosaic]] theorem asserts that in order for a process of [[Scientific Change|scientific change]] to be possible, the mosaic must necessarily contain at least one element. Scientific change is impossible in an empty mosaic. It can be deduced from the [[The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)|second law]], which asserts that in order to become accepted into the mosaic, a [[Theory|theory]] is assessed by the [[Method|method]] actually employed at the time, and the [[The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015)|third law]], which asserts that a method becomes employed only when it is deducible from other employed methods and accepted theories of the time.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 226]] | ||
{{PrintDiagramFile|diagram file=non-empty-mosaic-theorem.jpg}} | {{PrintDiagramFile|diagram file=non-empty-mosaic-theorem.jpg}} | ||
|Resource=Barseghyan (2015) | |Resource=Barseghyan (2015) | ||
| + | |Prehistory= | ||
| + | |History= | ||
| + | |Page Status=Editor Approved | ||
| + | |Editor Notes= | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Acceptance Record | {{Acceptance Record | ||
| Line 21: | Line 31: | ||
|Acceptance Indicators=The theorem became ''de facto'' accepted by the community at that time together with the whole [[The Theory of Scientific Change|theory of scientific change]]. | |Acceptance Indicators=The theorem became ''de facto'' accepted by the community at that time together with the whole [[The Theory of Scientific Change|theory of scientific change]]. | ||
|Still Accepted=Yes | |Still Accepted=Yes | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Era= | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Year= | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Month= | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Day= | ||
|Accepted Until Approximate=No | |Accepted Until Approximate=No | ||
| + | |Rejection Indicators= | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:24, 10 November 2023
This is an answer to the question Necessary Elements that states "In order for the process of scientific change to be possible, the mosaic must necessarily contain at least one element. That is, scientific change is impossible in an empty mosaic."
Non-Empty Mosaic theorem was formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015.1
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
| Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | The theorem became de facto accepted by the community at that time together with the whole theory of scientific change. | Yes |
Question Answered
Non-Empty Mosaic theorem (Barseghyan-2015) is an attempt to answer the following question:
See Necessary Elements for more details.
Description
The non-empty mosaic theorem asserts that in order for a process of scientific change to be possible, the mosaic must necessarily contain at least one element. Scientific change is impossible in an empty mosaic. It can be deduced from the second law, which asserts that in order to become accepted into the mosaic, a theory is assessed by the method actually employed at the time, and the third law, which asserts that a method becomes employed only when it is deducible from other employed methods and accepted theories of the time.1p. 226
Reasons
Reason: Deduction of the Non-Empty Mosaic theorem
Scientific change is impossible in an empty mosaic. It can be deduced from the second law, which asserts that in order to become accepted into the mosaic, a theory is assessed by the method actually employed at the time, and the third law, which asserts that a method becomes employed only when it is deducible from other employed methods and accepted theories of the time.1p. 226
This reason for Non-Empty Mosaic theorem (Barseghyan-2015) was formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015.1
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
Questions About This Theory
There are no higher-order questions concerning this theory.
If a question about this theory is missing, please add it here.
