Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Create the page "Theories" on this wiki! See also the search results found.
Page title matches
- |Question=Are there theories that are necessarily part of any mosaic? |Question Title=Necessary Theories1 KB (160 words) - 15:43, 23 January 2023
- ...o be the largest and least bounded, due to the fact that many scientonomic theories could be traced began to the classics of philosophy of science. So it is im ...(Barseghyan-2015)]] should only indicate those authors who also held that theories become accepted when they satisfy the requirements of the method employed a6 KB (963 words) - 02:14, 15 March 2018
- ...riptive theories that are necessarily part of any mosaic? What descriptive theories, is any, are ''necessary'' for the process of scientific change to occur? |Question Title=Necessary Descriptive Theories2 KB (216 words) - 17:37, 22 January 2023
- ...normative theories that are necessarily part of any mosaic? What normative theories, if any, are ''necessary'' for the process of scientific change to occur? |Question Title=Necessary Normative Theories2 KB (216 words) - 17:25, 22 January 2023
- ...n=What types of epistemic stances can be taken by epistemic agents towards theories? |Question Title=Epistemic Stances Towards Theories3 KB (437 words) - 20:19, 23 January 2023
- |Question=Is there a hierarchy of theories that determines hierarchical authority delegation, hierarchical anomaly-tol ...wn. The trans-historical prevalence of hierarchical structures surrounding theories suggests that these structures may not just be recurring accidents and thus9 KB (1,321 words) - 22:20, 4 November 2022
- ...of epistemic stances can be taken by epistemic agents towards descriptive theories? |Question Title=Epistemic Stances Towards Descriptive Theories2 KB (212 words) - 22:17, 19 February 2023
- |Question=What is the status of '''tacit theories''' in the scientific mosaic? Is it possible for a community to actually acc1 KB (203 words) - 16:15, 21 February 2023
- ...es of epistemic stances can be taken by epistemic agents towards normative theories? |Question Title=Epistemic Stances Towards Normative Theories1 KB (200 words) - 20:02, 10 February 2023
- |Question=How do theories within a discipline shape and change the core questions of the disciplines? ...olutionary theory.[[CiteRef::Ereshefsky (2017)]] Thus, the question of how theories within a discipline shape and change core questions of the discipline is an1 KB (181 words) - 22:44, 3 August 2021
File:The First Law for Theories Deduction.png The deduction of [[The First Law for Theories|the first law for theories]] from [[The First Law|the first law]].(1,331 × 262 (29 KB)) - 04:14, 17 February 2016
File:Two Contender Theories Possible Assessment Outcomes.png (1,212 × 778 (143 KB)) - 20:37, 6 November 2023- |Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Theories |Title=The First Law for Theories12 KB (1,712 words) - 17:12, 2 November 2023
- |Question=What makes the theories of an agent's mosaic continue to remain in the mosaic? |Question Title=Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Theories2 KB (214 words) - 23:32, 21 February 2023
File:The First Law for Theories Barseghyan 2015.jpg (1,350 × 300 (120 KB)) - 02:36, 5 September 2016- ...=Does the third law allow for methods to be deductive consequences of used theories? ...a science that is growing and not ossified. Is it possible then, that used theories can be applied in method construction, or does this indicate that a theory1 KB (170 words) - 21:50, 18 March 2017
- |Title=Question Can Presuppose Theories |Formulation Text=A [[Question|question]] can presuppose [[Theory|theories]].1 KB (182 words) - 16:01, 28 December 2022
- |Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Theories |Title=The First Law for Theories612 bytes (80 words) - 19:44, 2 January 2024
- |Topic=Epistemic Stances Towards Theories ...ding to Barseghyan, acceptance as an epistemic stance can be taken towards theories.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 30-32]]1 KB (165 words) - 19:48, 23 January 2023
- |Topic=Epistemic Stances Towards Theories ...ed epistemic stances, the stance of ''scientificity'' can be taken towards theories.[[CiteRef::Sarwar and Fraser (2018)]]721 bytes (95 words) - 20:28, 23 January 2023
Page text matches
- * [[Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Scientificity (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)]] * [[Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015)]]339 bytes (38 words) - 20:27, 23 January 2023
- |Title=What Scientific Theories Could not be ...icular, this view equates theories that are distinct, and it distinguishes theories that are equivalent. Furthermore, the semantic view lacks the resources to743 bytes (100 words) - 01:15, 16 February 2017
- ...subtypes of theory?" etc. Ontological theories are first order descriptive theories. There are several subtypes of ontological theories:4 members (4 subcategories, 0 files) - 17:34, 19 December 2022
- ...accepted without a sufficient reason, i.e. in the cases of circularity or theories without a reason? ...ut another theory as a reason. In cases of circular reasoning, two or more theories seem to be reasons for one another, without an independent reason for accep1 KB (155 words) - 02:30, 11 June 2020
- * [[Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015)]] * [[Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015)]]262 bytes (31 words) - 20:25, 23 January 2023
- ...n epistemic communities cease to employ their methods, what happens to the theories previously accepted by the aforementioned methods? ...er theories. Is this indeed the case when the methods used to assess those theories are no longer employed?1 KB (152 words) - 12:05, 5 November 2018
- ...ion that the scope of scientonomy should also include changes in normative theories. ...mative Topic|Normative Topic]], click on it, and create it under the ''All Theories'' section.16 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 15:20, 15 January 2023
- |Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Theories |Title=The First Law for Theories612 bytes (80 words) - 19:44, 2 January 2024
- ...consist of?". Association theories are first order descriptive ontological theories.5 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:46, 18 December 2022
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015)668 bytes (87 words) - 20:25, 3 January 2024
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)700 bytes (89 words) - 20:50, 3 January 2024
- ...bers with?". Disjointness theories are first order descriptive ontological theories.0 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 21:43, 22 December 2022
- ...lement decay?". Existence theories are first order descriptive ontological theories.23 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:45, 18 December 2022
- ...requirements of methods that are higher in the hierarchy are preferred to theories that satisfy the requirements of methods that are lower in the hierarchy. ...archy. If such a theory is not found, the agent is then prepared to accept theories that satisfy even the even less stringent requirements of the third method1 KB (174 words) - 00:15, 11 June 2020
- ...riptive theories that are necessarily part of any mosaic? What descriptive theories, is any, are ''necessary'' for the process of scientific change to occur? |Question Title=Necessary Descriptive Theories2 KB (216 words) - 17:37, 22 January 2023
- |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Question=Is the first law for theories suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 a tautology?2 KB (219 words) - 20:49, 3 January 2024
- #REDIRECT [[Hierarchy of theories]]35 bytes (4 words) - 03:41, 25 October 2018
- |Title=The Structure of Scientific Theories successes, partly as a result of the pervasiveness of scientific theories.2 KB (224 words) - 01:08, 16 February 2017
- ..., many theories attempt to describe something. Thus, there are descriptive theories.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 5]] |Acceptance Indicators=The existence of descriptive theories became accepted together with the acceptance of the rest of the original TS873 bytes (108 words) - 22:14, 19 February 2023
- ...normative theories that are necessarily part of any mosaic? What normative theories, if any, are ''necessary'' for the process of scientific change to occur? |Question Title=Necessary Normative Theories2 KB (216 words) - 17:25, 22 January 2023
