Difference between revisions of "Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Reason
 
{{Reason
 
|Conclusion=Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
 
|Conclusion=Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
|Title=Ninit's reason
+
|Title=X reason
 +
|Premises=Resolution to the Paradox of Normative Propositions (Sebastien-2016)
 
|Diagram File=
 
|Diagram File=
 
|Authors List=Paul Patton
 
|Authors List=Paul Patton
 
|Formulated Year=2022
 
|Formulated Year=2022
 
|Description=Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason.
 
|Description=Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason.
|Resource=
+
|Resource=Palider (2019)
 
|Page Status=Stub
 
|Page Status=Stub
 
|Editor Notes=
 
|Editor Notes=
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 18:36, 21 October 2022

Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason. Good reason.This reason for Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) was formulated by Hakob Barseghyan, Patrick Fraser and Ameer Sarwar in 2018.1

References

  1. ^  Fraser, Patrick and Sarwar, Ameer. (2018) A Compatibility Law and the Classification of Theory Change. Scientonomy 2, 67-82. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/31278.