Group
What is group? How should it be defined?
As any other term referring to social agents of scientific change, group deserves a proper definition.
In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Nicholas Overgaard in 2016. The term is currently accepted by Scientonomy community.
In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is:
- Two or more people who share any characteristic.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record of the Term
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 19 May 2017 | The question became accepted with the publication of Overgaard's A Taxonomy for Social Agents of Scientific Change. | Yes |
All Definitions
Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
---|---|---|
Group (Overgaard-2017) | Two or more people who share any characteristic. | 2017 |
Accepted Definitions
Community | Theory | Formulation | Accepted From | Accepted Until |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | Group (Overgaard-2017) | Two or more people who share any characteristic. | 2 February 2018 |
Suggested Modifications
Modification | Community | Date Suggested | Summary | Date Assessed | Verdict | Verdict Rationale |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sciento-2017-0012 | Scientonomy | 19 May 2017 | Accept a new taxonomy for group and its two sub-types - accidental group, and community. | 2 February 2018 | Accepted | A consensus has emerged after a long discussion that the distinction and the respective definitions should be accepted. It was noted that "these formulations tend to be the starting point for so many of our discussions"c1 and that "despite all disagreements that this taxonomy causes, it is actually accepted by the community".c2 Yet, it was also indicated that whereas the definition of group as "two or more people that share a characteristic" is the best we have at the moment, it may be potentially necessary to pursue the idea of redefining it as "one or more people..." to allow for one-scientist communities.c3 Finally, while a question was raised whether there is any "value in defining accidental groups as something separate from groups",c4 it was eventually agreed that it is important to draw "a clear distinction between the two kinds of groups as accidental groups and communities".c5 |
Current Definition
In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is Group (Overgaard-2017).
Group (Overgaard-2017) states: "Two or more people who share any characteristic."
In Overgaard's taxonomy, the term group refers to the most basic societal entity - a set of two or more people. As such, it is meant to play the role of the most abstract class which has two sub-classes - community and accidental group.1
Ontology
Existence
In Scientonomy, it is currently accepted that "There is such a thing as a group."
Subtypes
In Scientonomy, the accepted subtypes of Group are:
Supertypes
In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted supertypes of Group.
Associations
In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted associations of Group.
Disjointness
In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Group.
If a question concerning the ontology of a group is missing, please add it here.
Dynamics
If a question concerning the dynamics of a group is missing, please add it here.
Related Topics
This term is also related to the following topic(s):
References
- ^ Overgaard, Nicholas. (2017) A Taxonomy for the Social Agents of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 1, 55-62. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/28234.