Mosaic Split
What is mosaic split? How should it be defined?
Mosaic split is one of the key concepts in current scientonomy. Thus, its proper definition is of great importance.
In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015. The term is currently accepted by Scientonomy community.
In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is:
- A scientific change where one mosaic transforms into two or more mosaics.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record of the Term
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | The term became accepted together with the whole theory of scientific change. | Yes |
All Definitions
Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
---|---|---|
Mosaic Split (Barseghyan-2015) | A scientific change where one mosaic transforms into two or more mosaics. | 2015 |
Accepted Definitions
Community | Theory | Formulation | Accepted From | Accepted Until |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | Mosaic Split (Barseghyan-2015) | A scientific change where one mosaic transforms into two or more mosaics. | 1 January 2016 |
Suggested Modifications
Current Definition
In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is Mosaic Split (Barseghyan-2015).
Mosaic Split (Barseghyan-2015) states: "A scientific change where one mosaic transforms into two or more mosaics."
To understand what is meant by mosaic split, consider the following case. "A community initially accepts some theories and employs some methods; in other words, initially, there is one mosaic of theories and methods. Also, as a result of some events, this initially united community transforms into two different communities with two somewhat different mosaics of theories and methods."1 This is different than mere disagreement. Mosaic split only occurs if there are two communities that each present their different theories as accepted (in contexts like articles, conferences, textbooks and so on). That is, there is disagreement concerning the status of certain theories, and not just on the theories themselves.1
There are several possible scenarios for mosaic split to occur. As per Barseghyan (2015), here are the possibilities: "a mosaic can split when the requirements of the current method are simultaneously satisfied by two or more competing theories. On the other hand, a mosaic can split when the outcome of theory assessment is inconclusive. While in the former case a mosaic split takes place necessarily, in the latter case it is merely possible."1 The derivation from these scenarios to resulting theorems about mosaic split can be found respectively on the Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) and Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) pages.
Ontology
Existence
In Scientonomy, it is currently accepted that "There is such a thing as a mosaic split."
Subtypes
In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted subtypes of Mosaic Split.
Supertypes
In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted supertypes of Mosaic Split.
Associations
In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted associations of Mosaic Split.
Disjointness
In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Mosaic Split.
If a question concerning the ontology of a mosaic split is missing, please add it here.
Dynamics
If a question concerning the dynamics of a mosaic split is missing, please add it here.
Related Topics
This term is also related to the following topic(s):