Gregory Rupik
Gregory Rupik (born 14 December 1985) is an American-Canadian historian and philosopher of science and a scientonomer, one of the co-founders of the scientonomy community and editor of the journal of Scientonomy.
Theories
The following table contains all the theories formulated by Rupik:
Title | Type | Formulation | Formulated In |
---|---|---|---|
Scientonomic Workflow (Barseghyan et al.-2016) | Normative | Scientonomic knowledge is best advanced by:
| 2016 |
Scientonomy Exists | Descriptive | There is such a thing as scientonomy. | 2016 |
Questions
Here are all the questions formulated by Rupik:
- Associations of Scientonomy: How is the class of scientonomy associated with other classes (and itself)? What aggregation, composition, or other association relations can exist between scientonomy, as well as between scientonomy and instances of other classes?
- Deriving Methods from an Empty Set: Does the possibility of a method being derived from an empty set pose a problem for the current formulation of the third law? Can we conceive of a situation in which a method is derived from an empty subset?
- Disjointness of Scientonomy: What other classes is the class of scientonomy disjoint with, i.e. classes that don't share any instances with scientonomy?
- Existence of Scientonomy: Does scientonomy exist?
- Implementation vs. Employment of Methods: Is there a difference between implementation and employment of a method? Is the mechanism of implementation the same as the mechanism of employment?
- Role of Used Theories in Method Employment: Does the third law allow for methods to be deductive consequences of used theories?
- Scientonomic Workflow: How should changes in the accepted body of scientonomic knowledge be introduced? What are the steps and procedures of the scientonomic workflow?
- Scientonomy: What is scientonomy? How should it be defined?
- Subtypes of Scientonomy: What are the subtypes of scientonomy?
- Supertypes of Scientonomy: What are the supertypes of scientonomy?
- Tautological Status of The First Law (Barseghyan-2015): Is the first law suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?
- Tautological Status of The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015): Is the first law for methods suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?
- Tautological Status of The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015): Is the first law for theories suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?
Publications
Here are the works of Rupik included in the bibliographic records of this encyclopedia:
- Friesen et al. (2023): Friesen, Izzy et al. (2023) Discussion of Suggested Modifications: Scientonomy Workshop, February 25, 2023. Scientonomy 5, D1-D32. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/42265.
- Rupik et al. (2022): Rupik, Gregory et al. (2022) Introduction. In Barseghyan et al. (Eds.) (2022), xi-xvi.
- Barseghyan et al. (Eds.) (2022): Barseghyan, Hakob et al. (Eds.). (2022) Scientonomy: The Challenges of Constructing a Theory of Scientific Change. Vernon Press.
- Rupik (2021): Rupik, Gregory. (2021) Ateleological Propagation in Goethe’s Metamorphosis of Plants. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43, 32.
- Rupik (2019): Rupik, Gregory. (2019) Scientonomy: A Bold New Vision for an Integrated History and Philosophy of Science. In Herring et al. (Eds.) (2019), 19-37.
- Barseghyan, Overgaard, and Rupik (2018): Barseghyan, Hakob; Overgaard, Nicholas and Rupik, Gregory. (2018) Introduction to History and Philosophy of Science. Open Library. eCampus Ontario. Retrieved from https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/introhps/.
To add a bibliographic record by this author, enter the citation key below:
Citation keys normally include author names followed by the publication year in brackets. E.g. Aristotle (1984), Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen (1935), Musgrave and Pigden (2016), Kuhn (1970a), Lakatos and Musgrave (Eds.) (1970). If a record with that citation key already exists, you will be sent to a form to edit that page.