Difference between revisions of "Modification:Sciento-2018-0003"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Modification |Community=Community:Scientonomy |Acronym=Sciento |Summary=Accept that the epistemic stance that can be taken by an epistemic agent towards a question is ''ques...")
 
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
|Date Suggested Day=12
 
|Date Suggested Day=12
 
|Date Suggested Approximate=No
 
|Date Suggested Approximate=No
|Authors List=William Rawleigh,
+
|Authors List=William Rawleigh
 
|Resource=Rawleigh (2018)
 
|Resource=Rawleigh (2018)
|Preamble=Once we accept that questions as a distinct epistemic element of the scientonomic ontology, we need to indicate what types of stance an epistemic agent can take towards questions. This modification suggests that a question can be ''accepted'' or ''unaccepted'' by epistemic agents as a legitimate topic of inquiry.
+
|Preamble=Once we accept that questions as a distinct epistemic element of the scientonomic ontology, we need to indicate what types of stance an epistemic agent can take towards questions. This modification suggests that a question can be ''accepted'' or ''unaccepted'' by epistemic agents as a legitimate topic of inquiry and provides a definition of ''question acceptance''.
|To Accept=Question Acceptance (Rawleigh-2018),
+
|Modification=
|Parent Modifications=Modification:Sciento-2018-0002,
+
|To Accept=Epistemic Stances Towards Questions - Question Acceptance (Rawleigh-2018), Question Acceptance (Rawleigh-2018), Question Acceptance Exists, Question Acceptance Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Rawleigh-2018)
|Verdict=Open
+
|Parent Modifications=Modification:Sciento-2018-0002
 +
|Automatic=No
 +
|Verdict=Accepted
 +
|Date Assessed Year=2018
 +
|Date Assessed Month=November
 +
|Date Assessed Day=1
 
|Date Assessed Approximate=No
 
|Date Assessed Approximate=No
 +
|Verdict Rationale=It was noted that "the whole point of adding questions to the ontology of epistemic elements was that we can legitimately speak of a question being accepted by a certain agent at a certain time".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0003#comment-83|c1]]</sup> The discussion also revealed a need to distinguish "a situation where no consensus exists from a situation where a consensus exists that a question is illegitimate".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0003#comment-87|c2]]</sup> In other words, "just as question acceptance, theory acceptance too seems to allow for three values: (clearly) accepted; (clearly) unaccepted; no consensus".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0003#comment-89|c3]]</sup> Thus, a new question was suggested concerning the binary character of epistemic stances: "are all epistemic stances binary, or do they allow for more than two values?"<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0003#comment-89|c4]]</sup>
 +
|Superseded By=
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 20:36, 23 January 2023

Accept that the epistemic stance that can be taken by an epistemic agent towards a question is question acceptance (the opposite is unacceptance), where question acceptance is defined as "a question is said to be accepted if it is taken as a legitimate topic of inquiry".

The modification was suggested to Scientonomy community by William Rawleigh on 12 May 2018.1 This modification presupposes the acceptance of Sciento-2018-0002. The modification was accepted on 1 November 2018.

Preamble

Once we accept that questions as a distinct epistemic element of the scientonomic ontology, we need to indicate what types of stance an epistemic agent can take towards questions. This modification suggests that a question can be accepted or unaccepted by epistemic agents as a legitimate topic of inquiry and provides a definition of question acceptance.

Modification

Theories To Accept

Question Acceptance (Rawleigh-2018).png

Questions Answered

This modification attempts to answer the following question(s):

Verdict

The modification was accepted on 1 November 2018. It was noted that "the whole point of adding questions to the ontology of epistemic elements was that we can legitimately speak of a question being accepted by a certain agent at a certain time".c1 The discussion also revealed a need to distinguish "a situation where no consensus exists from a situation where a consensus exists that a question is illegitimate".c2 In other words, "just as question acceptance, theory acceptance too seems to allow for three values: (clearly) accepted; (clearly) unaccepted; no consensus".c3 Thus, a new question was suggested concerning the binary character of epistemic stances: "are all epistemic stances binary, or do they allow for more than two values?"c4

Click on the Discussion tab for comments.

References

  1. ^  Rawleigh, William. (2018) The Status of Questions in the Ontology of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 2, 1-12. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/29651.