Difference between revisions of "Scientificity of Questions"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Question=Can the epistemic stance of ''scientificity'' be taken towards ''questions''? Can there be unscientific or pseudoscientific questions?
 
|Question=Can the epistemic stance of ''scientificity'' be taken towards ''questions''? Can there be unscientific or pseudoscientific questions?
 
|Topic Type=Descriptive
 
|Topic Type=Descriptive
|Description=Scientific mosaics consist of theories, methods, and questions.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)]][[CiteRef::Sebastien (2016)]][[CiteRef::Rawleigh (2018)]] Sarwar and Fraser have argued that an independent stance, called ''scientificity'', can be taken towards ''theories'', namely that epistemic agents can consider a given theory to be scientific or unscientific independent of the agent's other stances of acceptance, use, and pursuit.[[CiteRef::Sarwar and Fraser (2018)]] The question, likewise, can be asked whether epistemic agents can take the stance of scientificity towards questions. Do they regard certain questions as scientific but do not pursue them? Are some questions explored by epistemic agents even though they are not, at the time of exploration, considered scientific? Whether or not, and if so, how, the stance of scientificity is taken towards questions is an important scientonomic topic of inquiry, because they form an integral part of the scientific mosaic.
+
|Description=Sarwar and Fraser have argued that an independent stance, called ''scientificity'', can be taken towards ''theories'', namely that epistemic agents can consider a given theory as scientific or unscientific independent of any other stances an agent may take towards it.[[CiteRef::Sarwar and Fraser (2018)]] The question, then, arises whether epistemic agents can take the stance of scientificity towards questions. Do they regard certain questions as scientific but do not puruse them? Are some questions explored by epistemic agents even though they are not, at the time of exploration, considered scientific? Whether or not, and if so, how, the stance of scientificity is taken towards questions is an important topic of scientonomic inquiry.
 
|Parent Topic=Epistemic Stances Towards Questions
 
|Parent Topic=Epistemic Stances Towards Questions
 
|Authors List=Ameer Sarwar, Patrick Fraser,
 
|Authors List=Ameer Sarwar, Patrick Fraser,

Latest revision as of 05:48, 3 March 2019

Can the epistemic stance of scientificity be taken towards questions? Can there be unscientific or pseudoscientific questions?

Sarwar and Fraser have argued that an independent stance, called scientificity, can be taken towards theories, namely that epistemic agents can consider a given theory as scientific or unscientific independent of any other stances an agent may take towards it.1 The question, then, arises whether epistemic agents can take the stance of scientificity towards questions. Do they regard certain questions as scientific but do not puruse them? Are some questions explored by epistemic agents even though they are not, at the time of exploration, considered scientific? Whether or not, and if so, how, the stance of scientificity is taken towards questions is an important topic of scientonomic inquiry.

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Patrick Fraser and Ameer Sarwar in 2018.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Our records state that this question has never been accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by any community.

All Theories

According to our records, no theory has attempted to answer this question.

If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.

Suggested Modifications

According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.

Current View

There is currently no accepted answer to this question.


Related Topics

This question is a subquestion of Epistemic Stances Towards Questions.

References

  1. ^  Sarwar, Ameer and Fraser, Patrick. (2018) Scientificity and The Law of Theory Demarcation. Scientonomy 2, 55-66. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/31275.