Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Create the page "Theories" on this wiki! See also the search results found.
Page title matches
- |Question=Are there theories that are necessarily part of any mosaic? |Question Title=Necessary Theories1 KB (160 words) - 15:43, 23 January 2023
- ...normative theories that are necessarily part of any mosaic? What normative theories, if any, are ''necessary'' for the process of scientific change to occur? |Question Title=Necessary Normative Theories2 KB (216 words) - 17:25, 22 January 2023
- ...riptive theories that are necessarily part of any mosaic? What descriptive theories, is any, are ''necessary'' for the process of scientific change to occur? |Question Title=Necessary Descriptive Theories2 KB (216 words) - 17:37, 22 January 2023
- |Question=Is there a hierarchy of theories that determines hierarchical authority delegation, hierarchical anomaly-tol ...wn. The trans-historical prevalence of hierarchical structures surrounding theories suggests that these structures may not just be recurring accidents and thus9 KB (1,321 words) - 22:20, 4 November 2022
- ...n=What types of epistemic stances can be taken by epistemic agents towards theories? |Question Title=Epistemic Stances Towards Theories3 KB (437 words) - 20:19, 23 January 2023
- ...of epistemic stances can be taken by epistemic agents towards descriptive theories? |Question Title=Epistemic Stances Towards Descriptive Theories2 KB (212 words) - 22:17, 19 February 2023
- |Question=What is the status of '''tacit theories''' in the scientific mosaic? Is it possible for a community to actually acc1 KB (203 words) - 16:15, 21 February 2023
- ...es of epistemic stances can be taken by epistemic agents towards normative theories? |Question Title=Epistemic Stances Towards Normative Theories1 KB (200 words) - 20:02, 10 February 2023
- |Question=How do theories within a discipline shape and change the core questions of the disciplines? ...olutionary theory.[[CiteRef::Ereshefsky (2017)]] Thus, the question of how theories within a discipline shape and change core questions of the discipline is an1 KB (181 words) - 22:44, 3 August 2021
- |Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Theories |Title=The First Law for Theories12 KB (1,712 words) - 17:12, 2 November 2023
- |Question=What makes the theories of an agent's mosaic continue to remain in the mosaic? |Question Title=Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Theories2 KB (214 words) - 23:32, 21 February 2023
- ...=Does the third law allow for methods to be deductive consequences of used theories? ...a science that is growing and not ossified. Is it possible then, that used theories can be applied in method construction, or does this indicate that a theory1 KB (170 words) - 21:50, 18 March 2017
- |Topic=Epistemic Stances Towards Theories ...ed epistemic stances, the stance of ''scientificity'' can be taken towards theories.[[CiteRef::Sarwar and Fraser (2018)]]721 bytes (95 words) - 20:28, 23 January 2023
- 434 bytes (54 words) - 16:24, 21 February 2023
- 242 bytes (31 words) - 16:26, 21 February 2023
- |Question=What makes the normative theories of an agent's mosaic continue to remain in the mosaic? |Question Title=Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Normative Theories2 KB (214 words) - 19:38, 2 January 2024
- 305 bytes (39 words) - 16:26, 21 February 2023
- |Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Theories |Title=The First Law for Theories612 bytes (80 words) - 19:44, 2 January 2024
- |Topic=Epistemic Stances Towards Theories ...ording to Barseghyan, the epistemic stance of pursuit can be taken towards theories, i.e. an epistemic agent can find a theory pursuitworthy.[[CiteRef::Barsegh1 KB (160 words) - 19:48, 23 January 2023
- |Question=Is the theory of scientific change applicable to theories construed as sets of models, or in ways that reject their purely formal cha ...f scientific change compatible with these more recent and broader views of theories?2 KB (268 words) - 22:51, 9 July 2017
Page text matches
- * [[Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Scientificity (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)]] * [[Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015)]]339 bytes (38 words) - 20:27, 23 January 2023
- |Title=What Scientific Theories Could not be ...icular, this view equates theories that are distinct, and it distinguishes theories that are equivalent. Furthermore, the semantic view lacks the resources to743 bytes (100 words) - 01:15, 16 February 2017
- ...accepted without a sufficient reason, i.e. in the cases of circularity or theories without a reason? ...ut another theory as a reason. In cases of circular reasoning, two or more theories seem to be reasons for one another, without an independent reason for accep1 KB (155 words) - 02:30, 11 June 2020
- * [[Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015)]] * [[Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015)]]262 bytes (31 words) - 20:25, 23 January 2023
- ...n epistemic communities cease to employ their methods, what happens to the theories previously accepted by the aforementioned methods? ...er theories. Is this indeed the case when the methods used to assess those theories are no longer employed?1 KB (152 words) - 12:05, 5 November 2018
- |Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Theories |Title=The First Law for Theories612 bytes (80 words) - 19:44, 2 January 2024
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015)668 bytes (87 words) - 20:25, 3 January 2024
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)700 bytes (89 words) - 20:50, 3 January 2024
- ...requirements of methods that are higher in the hierarchy are preferred to theories that satisfy the requirements of methods that are lower in the hierarchy. ...archy. If such a theory is not found, the agent is then prepared to accept theories that satisfy even the even less stringent requirements of the third method1 KB (174 words) - 00:15, 11 June 2020
- ...riptive theories that are necessarily part of any mosaic? What descriptive theories, is any, are ''necessary'' for the process of scientific change to occur? |Question Title=Necessary Descriptive Theories2 KB (216 words) - 17:37, 22 January 2023
- |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Question=Is the first law for theories suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 a tautology?2 KB (219 words) - 20:49, 3 January 2024
- #REDIRECT [[Hierarchy of theories]]35 bytes (4 words) - 03:41, 25 October 2018
- |Title=The Structure of Scientific Theories successes, partly as a result of the pervasiveness of scientific theories.2 KB (224 words) - 01:08, 16 February 2017
- ..., many theories attempt to describe something. Thus, there are descriptive theories.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 5]] |Acceptance Indicators=The existence of descriptive theories became accepted together with the acceptance of the rest of the original TS873 bytes (108 words) - 22:14, 19 February 2023
- ...normative theories that are necessarily part of any mosaic? What normative theories, if any, are ''necessary'' for the process of scientific change to occur? |Question Title=Necessary Normative Theories2 KB (216 words) - 17:25, 22 January 2023
- |Question=Is the theory of scientific change applicable to theories construed as sets of models, or in ways that reject their purely formal cha ...f scientific change compatible with these more recent and broader views of theories?2 KB (268 words) - 22:51, 9 July 2017
- |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is the first law for theories suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?2 KB (264 words) - 20:24, 3 January 2024
- ...tonomy that it should explain changes in the scientific mosaic of accepted theories and employed methods, which are changes at the level of the scientific comm ...instein, and the changes in their beliefs as they constructed and assessed theories, [[Scientific Change|changes to the scientific mosaic itself]] happen at th2 KB (273 words) - 16:11, 6 July 2017
- ...e met? What do we do when we would like to keep certain theories but those theories are left in limbo? ...know they are being operated on. Surely we do not outright reject surgical theories on the basis they cannot be tested in this way? Do we develop some alternat1 KB (182 words) - 18:14, 12 March 2018
- ...tion=Is it conceivable that, following the rejection of a method, that any theories which satisfied its requirements also would become rejected, seeing as how ...eories that became accepted due to it? What does a community do with these theories? Do they remain accepted? Are they assessed by another method?2 KB (297 words) - 17:21, 16 October 2022
