Search by property

Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

Search by property

A list of all pages that have property "Formulation Text" with value "Barseghyan's original second law is tautological.". Since there have been only a few results, also nearby values are displayed.

Showing below up to 26 results starting with #1.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

    

List of results

  • Mechanism of Scientific Change  + (An element of the mosaic remains in the mosaic unless replaced by other elements.)
  • Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Theories  + (An element of the mosaic remains in the mosaic unless replaced by other elements.)
  • Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Normative Theories  + (An element of the mosaic remains in the mosaic unless replaced by other elements.)
  • Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Methods  + (An element of the mosaic remains in the mosaic unless replaced by other elements.)
  • The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015)  + (An employed method remains employed unless replaced by other methods.)
  • Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Methods  + (An employed method remains employed unless replaced by other methods.)
  • Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Normative Theories  + (An employed method remains employed unless replaced by other methods.)
  • The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)  + (An employed norm remains employed in the mosaic unless replaced by other elements.)
  • Global Epistemic Action (Allen-2023)  + (An epistemic action that is available to all epistemic agents trans-historically and universally.)
  • Local Epistemic Action (Allen-2023)  + (An epistemic action that is not available trans-historically to all epistemic agents, but is specific to some time periods or some agents.)
  • Question Pursuit (Barseghyan-2022)  + (An epistemic agent ''S'' considers a question ''Q'' pursuitworthy, if and only if ''S'' accepts that it is worth finding a theory ''T'' that answers ''Q''.)
  • Error (Machado-Marques-Patton-2021)  + (An epistemic agent is said to commit an error if the agent accepts a theory that should not have been accepted given that agent’s employed method.)
  • Error  + (An epistemic agent is said to commit an error if the agent accepts a theory that should not have been accepted given that agent’s employed method.)
  • Tool Reliance (Patton-2019)  + (An epistemic agent is said to rely on an epistemic tool ''iff'' there is a procedure through which the tool can provide an acceptable source of knowledge for answering some question under the employed method of that agent.)
  • Outcome Inconclusive (Barseghyan-2015)  + (An outcome of theory assessment which allows for the theory to be accepted but doesn't dictate so.)
  • Outcome Accept (Barseghyan-2015)  + (An outcome of theory assessment which prescribes that the theory must be accepted.)
  • Outcome Not Accept (Barseghyan-2015)  + (An outcome of theory assessment which prescribes that the theory must not be accepted.)
  • Scientific Change (Barseghyan-2015)  + (Any change in the ''scientific mosaic'', i.e. a transition from one accepted ''theory'' to another or from one employed ''method'' to another.)
  • Scientific Change  + (Any change in the ''scientific mosaic'', i.e. a transition from one accepted ''theory'' to another or from one employed ''method'' to another.)
  • Compatibility Corollary (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)  + (At any moment of time, the elements of the scientific mosaic are compatible with each other.)
  • The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)  + (At any moment of time, the elements of the scientific mosaic are compatible with each other.)
  • Compatibility of Mosaic Elements  + (At any moment of time, the elements of the scientific mosaic are compatible with each other.)
  • Assessment of Scientonomy - Relevant Facts (Barseghyan-2015)  + (At the level of metatheory, the relevant e … At the level of metatheory, the relevant evidence for assessing a scientonomic theory ''ought to be'' the facts relating to the state of the ''scientific mosaic'' and its ''transitions''. The complete list of relevant phenomena that ought to be considered can ''only'' be identified for a specific scientonomic theory.tified for a specific scientonomic theory.)
  • Assessment of Scientonomy - Relevant Facts  + (At the level of metatheory, the relevant e … At the level of metatheory, the relevant evidence for assessing a scientonomic theory ''ought to be'' the facts relating to the state of the ''scientific mosaic'' and its ''transitions''. The complete list of relevant phenomena that ought to be considered can ''only'' be identified for a specific scientonomic theory.tified for a specific scientonomic theory.)
  • Assessment of Scientonomy  + (At the level of metatheory, the relevant e … At the level of metatheory, the relevant evidence for assessing a scientonomic theory ''ought to be'' the facts relating to the state of the ''scientific mosaic'' and its ''transitions''. The complete list of relevant phenomena that ought to be considered can ''only'' be identified for a specific scientonomic theory.tified for a specific scientonomic theory.)
  • Anomalies  + (At the level of metatheory, the relevant e … At the level of metatheory, the relevant evidence for assessing a scientonomic theory ''ought to be'' the facts relating to the state of the ''scientific mosaic'' and its ''transitions''. The complete list of relevant phenomena that ought to be considered can ''only'' be identified for a specific scientonomic theory.tified for a specific scientonomic theory.)
  • Mutual Authority Delegation (Overgaard-Loiselle-2016)  + (Communities A and B are said to be in a relationship of mutual authority delegation ''iff'' community A delegates authority over topic ''x'' to community B, and community B delegates authority over topic ''y'' to community A.)
  • One-sided Authority Delegation (Overgaard-Loiselle-2016)  + (Communities A and B are said to be in a relationship of one-sided authority delegation ''iff'' community A delegates authority over topic ''x'' to community B, but community B doesn’t delegate any authority to community A.)
  • Authority Delegation (Overgaard-Loiselle-2016)  + (Community A is said to be delegating authority over topic ''x'' to community B ''iff'' (1) community A accepts that community B is an expert on topic ''x'' and (2) community A will accept a theory on topic ''x'' if community B says so.)
  • Singular Authority Delegation (Loiselle-2017)  + (Community A is said to engage in a relationship of singular authority delegation over topic ''x'' ''iff'' community A delegates authority over topic ''x'' to exactly one community.)
  • Multiple Authority Delegation (Loiselle-2017)  + (Community A is said to engage in a relationship of multiple authority delegation over topic ''x'' ''iff'' community A delegates authority over topic ''x'' to more than one community.)
  • Acceptance Criteria (Barseghyan-2015)  + (Criteria for determining whether a theory is ''acceptable'' or ''unacceptable.'')
  • Acceptance Criteria  + (Criteria for determining whether a theory is ''acceptable'' or ''unacceptable.'')
  • Demarcation Criteria (Barseghyan-2015)  + (Criteria for determining whether a theory is ''scientific'' or ''unscientific.'')
  • Demarcation Criteria  + (Criteria for determining whether a theory is ''scientific'' or ''unscientific.'')
  • Compatibility Criteria (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)  + (Criteria for determining whether two elements are compatible or incompatible.)
  • Compatibility Criteria  + (Criteria for determining whether two elements are compatible or incompatible.)
  • Compatibility Criteria (Barseghyan-2015)  + (Criteria for determining whether two theories are ''compatible'' or ''incompatible.'')
  • Authority Delegation (Patton-2019)  + (Epistemic agent A is said to be delegating authority over question ''x'' to epistemic agent B ''iff'' (1) agent A accepts that agent B is an expert on question ''x'' and (2) agent A will accept a theory answering question ''x'' if agent B says so.)
  • Authority Delegation  + (Epistemic agent A is said to be delegating authority over question ''x'' to epistemic agent B ''iff'' (1) agent A accepts that agent B is an expert on question ''x'' and (2) agent A will accept a theory answering question ''x'' if agent B says so.)
  • Singular Authority Delegation (Patton-2019)  + (Epistemic agent A is said to engage in a relationship of singular authority delegation over question ''x'' ''iff'' A delegates authority over question ''x'' to exactly one epistemic agent.)
  • Singular Authority Delegation  + (Epistemic agent A is said to engage in a relationship of singular authority delegation over question ''x'' ''iff'' A delegates authority over question ''x'' to exactly one epistemic agent.)
  • Multiple Authority Delegation (Patton-2019)  + (Epistemic agent A is said to engage in a relationship of multiple authority delegation over question ''x'' ''iff'' A delegates authority over question ''x'' to more than one epistemic agent.)
  • Multiple Authority Delegation  + (Epistemic agent A is said to engage in a relationship of multiple authority delegation over question ''x'' ''iff'' A delegates authority over question ''x'' to more than one epistemic agent.)
  • Mutual Authority Delegation (Patton-2019)  + (Epistemic agents A and B are said to be in a relationship of mutual authority delegation ''iff'' A delegates authority over question ''x'' to B, and B delegates authority over question ''y'' to A.)
  • Mutual Authority Delegation  + (Epistemic agents A and B are said to be in a relationship of mutual authority delegation ''iff'' A delegates authority over question ''x'' to B, and B delegates authority over question ''y'' to A.)
  • One-sided Authority Delegation (Patton-2019)  + (Epistemic agents A and B are said to be in a relationship of one-sided authority delegation ''iff'' A delegates authority over question ''x'' to B, but B doesn’t delegate any authority to A.)
  • One-sided Authority Delegation  + (Epistemic agents A and B are said to be in a relationship of one-sided authority delegation ''iff'' A delegates authority over question ''x'' to B, but B doesn’t delegate any authority to A.)
  • Demarcation-Acceptance Synchronism (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)  + (Every theory that becomes accepted satisfies the demarcation criteria employed at the time of acceptance.)
  • The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) is Tautological (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)  + (Harder's zeroth law is tautological.)
Retrieved from "https://www.scientowiki.com/Special:SearchByProperty/:Formulation-20Text/Barseghyan%27s-20original-20second-20law-20is-20tautological."