Search by property

Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

Search by property

A list of all pages that have property "Formulation Text" with value "There is such a thing as an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].". Since there have been only a few results, also nearby values are displayed.

Showing below up to 26 results starting with #1.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)


    

List of results

  • Epistemic Stance Exists  + (There is such a thing as an [[Epistemic Stance|epistemic stance]].)
  • Existence of Epistemic Stance  + (There is such a thing as an [[Epistemic Stance|epistemic stance]].)
  • Individual Epistemic Agent Exists  + (There is such a thing as an [[Individual Epistemic Agent|individual epistemic agent]].)
  • Existence of Individual Epistemic Agent  + (There is such a thing as an [[Individual Epistemic Agent|individual epistemic agent]].)
  • Scientific Underdeterminism theorem (Barseghyan-2015)  + (Transitions from one state of the mosaic to another are not necessarily deterministic. Scientific change is not a strictly deterministic process.)
  • Determinism vs. Underdeterminism in Scientific Change  + (Transitions from one state of the mosaic tTransitions from one state of the mosaic to another are not necessarily deterministic. Scientific change is not a strictly deterministic process. The process of method change is not necessarily deterministic: employed methods are by no means the only possible implementations of abstract requirements. The process of theory change is not necessarily deterministic: there may be cases when both a theory's acceptance and its unacceptance are equally possible. eptance are equally possible. )
  • Mechanism of Scientific Change  + (Transitions from one state of the mosaic tTransitions from one state of the mosaic to another are not necessarily deterministic. Scientific change is not a strictly deterministic process. The process of method change is not necessarily deterministic: employed methods are by no means the only possible implementations of abstract requirements. The process of theory change is not necessarily deterministic: there may be cases when both a theory's acceptance and its unacceptance are equally possible. eptance are equally possible. )
  • Group (Overgaard-2017)  + (Two or more people who share any characteristic.)
  • Group  + (Two or more people who share any characteristic.)
  • Split Due to Inconclusiveness theorem (Barseghyan-2015)  + (When a mosaic split is a result of the acceptance of only one theory, it can only be a result of inconclusive theory assessment.)
  • Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015)  + (When a theory assessment outcome is inconclusive, a mosaic split is possible.)
  • Mechanism of Mosaic Split  + (When two mutually incompatible theories saWhen two mutually incompatible theories satisfy the requirements of the current method, the mosaic necessarily splits in two. When a theory assessment outcome is inconclusive, a mosaic split is possible. When a mosaic split is a result of the acceptance of only one theory, it can only be a result of inconclusive theory assessment. conclusive theory assessment. )
  • Mechanism of Scientific Change  + (When two mutually incompatible theories saWhen two mutually incompatible theories satisfy the requirements of the current method, the mosaic necessarily splits in two. When a theory assessment outcome is inconclusive, a mosaic split is possible. When a mosaic split is a result of the acceptance of only one theory, it can only be a result of inconclusive theory assessment. conclusive theory assessment. )
  • Indicators of Inconclusiveness  + (When two mutually incompatible theories saWhen two mutually incompatible theories satisfy the requirements of the current method, the mosaic necessarily splits in two. When a theory assessment outcome is inconclusive, a mosaic split is possible. When a mosaic split is a result of the acceptance of only one theory, it can only be a result of inconclusive theory assessment. conclusive theory assessment. )
  • Role of Sociocultural Factors in Mosaic Split  + (When two mutually incompatible theories saWhen two mutually incompatible theories satisfy the requirements of the current method, the mosaic necessarily splits in two. When a theory assessment outcome is inconclusive, a mosaic split is possible. When a mosaic split is a result of the acceptance of only one theory, it can only be a result of inconclusive theory assessment. conclusive theory assessment. )
  • Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015)  + (When two mutually incompatible theories satisfy the requirements of the current method, the mosaic necessarily splits in two.)
  • Compatibility Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)  + ([[Compatibility]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Stance]], i.e. epistemic stance is a supertype of compatibility.)
  • Supertypes of Compatibility  + ([[Compatibility]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Stance]], i.e. epistemic stance is a supertype of compatibility.)
  • Definition Is a Subtype of Theory (Barseghyan-2018)  + ([[Definition]] is a subtype of [[Theory]], i.e. theory is a supertype of definition.)
  • Supertypes of Definition  + ([[Definition]] is a subtype of [[Theory]], i.e. theory is a supertype of definition.)
  • Descriptive Theory Is a Subtype of Theory (Barseghyan-2015)  + ([[Descriptive Theory]] is a subtype of [[Theory]], i.e. theory is a supertype of descriptive theory.)
  • Supertypes of Descriptive Theory  + ([[Descriptive Theory]] is a subtype of [[Theory]], i.e. theory is a supertype of descriptive theory.)
  • Element Decay Is a Non-Scientonomic Phenomenon (Oh-2021)  + ([[Element Decay|Element Decay]] is a non-scientonomic phenomenon.)
  • Epistemic Community Is a Subtype of Epistemic Agent (Barseghyan-2018)  + ([[Epistemic Community]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Agent]], i.e. epistemic agent is a supertype of epistemic community.)