Search by property
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- Scope of Scientonomy + (Scientonomy ought to address the issue of how transitions from one accepted theory to another take place and what logic governs this evolution, and need not deal in questions of theory pursuit or use.)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Time Fields and Scale + (Scientonomy should account for all changes … Scientonomy should account for all changes to the scientific mosaic, regardless of which fields of inquiry they concern. Scientonomy should provide explanations of all kinds of changes to the scientific mosaic at ''all scales'' from the most minor transitions to the most major. Scientonomy ought to account for all scientific changes for all time periods where a scientific mosaic can be found. ientific mosaic can be found. )
- Scope of Scientonomy + (Scientonomy should account for all changes … Scientonomy should account for all changes to the scientific mosaic, regardless of which fields of inquiry they concern. Scientonomy should provide explanations of all kinds of changes to the scientific mosaic at ''all scales'' from the most minor transitions to the most major. Scientonomy ought to account for all scientific changes for all time periods where a scientific mosaic can be found. ientific mosaic can be found. )
- Scope of Scientonomy - All Fields (Barseghyan-2015) + (Scientonomy should account for all changes to the scientific mosaic, regardless of which fields of inquiry they concern.)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Appraisal (Barseghyan-2015) + (Scientonomy should describe and explain ho … Scientonomy should describe and explain how changes in the mosaic of accepted scientific theories and employed methods take place. Any such instance of scientific change is a result of appraisal, which is a decision of the community to accept a proposed modification to the mosaic. Scientonomy must provide an account of this appraisal process. A theory of scientific change is not required to account for the process of theory construction.nt for the process of theory construction.)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Construction and Appraisal + (Scientonomy should describe and explain ho … Scientonomy should describe and explain how changes in the mosaic of accepted scientific theories and employed methods take place. Any such instance of scientific change is a result of appraisal, which is a decision of the community to accept a proposed modification to the mosaic. Scientonomy must provide an account of this appraisal process. A theory of scientific change is not required to account for the process of theory construction.nt for the process of theory construction.)
- Scope of Scientonomy + (Scientonomy should describe and explain ho … Scientonomy should describe and explain how changes in the mosaic of accepted scientific theories and employed methods take place. Any such instance of scientific change is a result of appraisal, which is a decision of the community to accept a proposed modification to the mosaic. Scientonomy must provide an account of this appraisal process. A theory of scientific change is not required to account for the process of theory construction.nt for the process of theory construction.)
- Scope of Scientonomy - All Scales (Barseghyan-2015) + (Scientonomy should provide explanations of all kinds of changes to the scientific mosaic at ''all scales'' from the most minor transitions to the most major.)
- Sociocultural Factors in Theory Acceptance theorem (Barseghyan-2015) + (Sociocultural factors can affect the process of theory acceptance insofar as it is permitted by the method employed at the time.)
- Role of Sociocultural Factors in Theory Acceptance + (Sociocultural factors can affect the process of theory acceptance insofar as it is permitted by the method employed at the time.)
- Role of Sociocultural Factors in Scientific Change + (Sociocultural factors can affect the process of theory acceptance insofar as it is permitted by the method employed at the time.)
- Mechanism of Scientific Change + (Sociocultural factors can affect the process of theory acceptance insofar as it is permitted by the method employed at the time.)
- Dogmatism No Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''dogmatism no theory change'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the first law, the second law, and the third law.)
- Dynamic Substantive Methods theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''dynamic substantive methods'' theorem follows from the synchronism of method rejection theorem and fallibilism.)
- Indicators of Method Employment (Barseghyan-2015) + (The ''employed method'' of theory appraisal of a community at some time is not necessarily indicated by the ''methodological texts'' of that time and must be inferred from ''actual patterns'' of theory acceptance and other ''indirect evidence''.)
- Indicators of Method Employment + (The ''employed method'' of theory appraisal of a community at some time is not necessarily indicated by the ''methodological texts'' of that time and must be inferred from ''actual patterns'' of theory acceptance and other ''indirect evidence''.)
- Local Action Availability theorem (Allen-2023) Reason1 + (The ''local action availability'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the ''law of norm employment'' and the definition of ''local action availability'')
- Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''method rejection'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the compatibility corollary and the first law.)
- Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''necessary mosaic split'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the second law and the zeroth law.)
- Non-Empty Mosaic theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''non-empty mosaic'' theorem follows deductively from the second law and the third law.)
- Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''possible mosaic split theorem'' follows as a deductive consequence of the second and zeroth laws.)
- Split Due to Inconclusiveness theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''split due to inconclusiveness'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the possible mosaic split theorem.)
- Static Procedural Methods theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''static procedural methods'' theorem follows from the method rejection theorem.)
- Synchronism of Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''synchronism of method rejection'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the method rejection theorem and the third law.)
- Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''theory rejection'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the compatibility corollary and the first law.)
- Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason2 + (The ''theory rejection'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the first and zeroth laws.)
- Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) + (The ability of two elements to coexist in the same mosaic.)
- Compatibility + (The ability of two elements to coexist in the same mosaic.)
- Allow Modification Reformulations (Shaw-Barseghyan-2019) + (The commentators of suggested modification … The commentators of suggested modifications are allowed to suggest reformulations of the original formulations in the comments. By default, the new formulation should bear the original author’s name, unless the author decides to give credit to those who significantly contributed to the new reformulation.ntly contributed to the new reformulation.)
- Workflow - Reformulating Suggesting Modifications + (The commentators of suggested modification … The commentators of suggested modifications are allowed to suggest reformulations of the original formulations in the comments. By default, the new formulation should bear the original author’s name, unless the author decides to give credit to those who significantly contributed to the new reformulation.ntly contributed to the new reformulation.)
- Contextual Appraisal theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The contextual appraisal theorem is a deductive consequence of the first law and the second law.)
- Workflow - Publishing Modification Comments + (The discussions concerning a suggested mod … The discussions concerning a suggested modification are to be published once a communal verdict is available. The discussions are to be published in the journal as special commentary articles co-authored by all participants of the discussion or in special edited collections.scussion or in special edited collections.)
- Publishing Modification Comments (Shaw-Barseghyan-Yan-2019) + (The discussions concerning a suggested mod … The discussions concerning a suggested modification are to be published once a communal verdict is available. The discussions are to be published in the journal as special commentary articles co-authored by all participants of the discussion or in special edited collections.scussion or in special edited collections.)
- Asynchronism of Method Employment theorem (Barseghyan-2015) + (The employment of new methods can ''be'' but is not ''necessarily'' a result of the acceptance of new theories.)
- Synchronism vs. Asynchronism of Method Employment + (The employment of new methods can ''be'' but is not ''necessarily'' a result of the acceptance of new theories.)
- Handling Ripple Effects - Editorial House Keeping (Shaw-Barseghyan-2019) + (The encyclopedia editors should be granted … The encyclopedia editors should be granted official housekeeping rights to handle the ripple effects. If the additional required changes are ''implicit'' in the suggested modification, the editors should create and alter encyclopedia pages to ensure that the accepted body of scientonomic knowledge is properly documented; if it is conceivable to accept the modification ''without'' accepting the ripple effect change in question, the editors should register these changes as new suggested modifications so that the community can discuss and evaluate them in an orderly fashion.s and evaluate them in an orderly fashion.)
- Workflow - Handling Ripple Effects + (The encyclopedia editors should be granted … The encyclopedia editors should be granted official housekeeping rights to handle the ripple effects. If the additional required changes are ''implicit'' in the suggested modification, the editors should create and alter encyclopedia pages to ensure that the accepted body of scientonomic knowledge is properly documented; if it is conceivable to accept the modification ''without'' accepting the ripple effect change in question, the editors should register these changes as new suggested modifications so that the community can discuss and evaluate them in an orderly fashion.s and evaluate them in an orderly fashion.)
- Response to the Argument from Bad Track Record (Barseghyan-2015) + (The failures of past theories of scientific change do not imply the inevitability of future failure or that the enterprise in inherently unsound.)
- Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from Bad Track Record + (The failures of past theories of scientific change do not imply the inevitability of future failure or that the enterprise in inherently unsound.)
- The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The first law for methods suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 is tautological.)
- The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The first law for norms suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 is tautological.)
- The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The first law for questions suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 is tautological.)
- The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The first law for theories suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 is tautological.)
- The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The first law for theories suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 is tautological.)
- The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The first law suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 is tautological.)
- Goals of Peer Review - Pursuitworthiness (Shaw-Barseghyan-2019) + (The goal of peer reviews in the scientonomic workflow is evaluation for ''pursuitworthiness'' rather than ''acceptability''.)
- Workflow - Goals of Peer Review + (The goal of peer reviews in the scientonomic workflow is evaluation for ''pursuitworthiness'' rather than ''acceptability''.)
- Error Rejection by Replacement (Machado-Marques-Patton-2021) + (The handling of instances of scientific error is consistent with the theory rejection theorem; it involves a replacement of an erroneously accepted theory either with a first- or second-order proposition.)
- Mechanism of Error Rejection + (The handling of instances of scientific error is consistent with the theory rejection theorem; it involves a replacement of an erroneously accepted theory either with a first- or second-order proposition.)
- The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) is Not Tautological (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) + (The law of compatibility suggested by Fraser and Sarwar in 2018 is not tautological.)
- Tautological Status of The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) + (The law of compatibility suggested by Fraser and Sarwar in 2018 is not tautological.)
- The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) is Not Tautological (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) + (The law of theory demarcation as formulated by Sarwar and Fraser in 2018 is not tautological.)