Search by property
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- Bearers of Mosaic - Communities (Barseghyan-2015) + (Only a community can be a bearer of a scientific mosaic.)
- Explicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) + (Propositional knowledge that has been openly formulated by the agent.)
- Explicit + (Propositional knowledge that has been openly formulated by the agent.)
- Explicable-Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) + (Propositional knowledge that hasn’t been openly formulated by the agent.)
- Explicable-Implicit + (Propositional knowledge that hasn’t been openly formulated by the agent.)
- Technological Knowledge as Part of Mosaic (Mirkin-2018) + (Propositional technological knowledge can be accepted and be part of a mosaic.)
- Status of Technological Knowledge + (Propositional technological knowledge can be accepted and be part of a mosaic.)
- Methods and Technical Research Tools + (Propositional technological knowledge can be accepted and be part of a mosaic.)
- Response to the Argument from Social Construction (Barseghyan-2015) + (Science can be said to be socially constructed in several different senses (e.g. the contingency, nominalist, and reducibility theses). None of these preclude the possibility of scientonomy.)
- Possibility of Scientonomy - The Argument from Social Construction + (Science can be said to be socially constructed in several different senses (e.g. the contingency, nominalist, and reducibility theses). None of these preclude the possibility of scientonomy.)
- Scientonomic Workflow + (Scientonomic knowledge is best advanced by … Scientonomic knowledge is best advanced by:</br># documenting the body of accepted communal knowledge knowledge in an online encyclopedia; </br># scrutinizing this accepted knowledge, identifying its flaws, and formulating open questions at seminars, conferences, publications, and other in-person or online formats; </br># publishing journal articles that propose modifications to our current knowledge and documenting these suggestions; </br># evaluating the suggested modifications with the goal of reaching a communal consensus and changing the respective encyclopedia pages when a verdict is reached.yclopedia pages when a verdict is reached.)
- Workflow - Goals of Peer Review + (Scientonomic knowledge is best advanced by … Scientonomic knowledge is best advanced by:</br># documenting the body of accepted communal knowledge knowledge in an online encyclopedia; </br># scrutinizing this accepted knowledge, identifying its flaws, and formulating open questions at seminars, conferences, publications, and other in-person or online formats; </br># publishing journal articles that propose modifications to our current knowledge and documenting these suggestions; </br># evaluating the suggested modifications with the goal of reaching a communal consensus and changing the respective encyclopedia pages when a verdict is reached.yclopedia pages when a verdict is reached.)
- Workflow - Closure Mechanism + (Scientonomic knowledge is best advanced by … Scientonomic knowledge is best advanced by:</br># documenting the body of accepted communal knowledge knowledge in an online encyclopedia; </br># scrutinizing this accepted knowledge, identifying its flaws, and formulating open questions at seminars, conferences, publications, and other in-person or online formats; </br># publishing journal articles that propose modifications to our current knowledge and documenting these suggestions; </br># evaluating the suggested modifications with the goal of reaching a communal consensus and changing the respective encyclopedia pages when a verdict is reached.yclopedia pages when a verdict is reached.)
- Workflow - Handling Ripple Effects + (Scientonomic knowledge is best advanced by … Scientonomic knowledge is best advanced by:</br># documenting the body of accepted communal knowledge knowledge in an online encyclopedia; </br># scrutinizing this accepted knowledge, identifying its flaws, and formulating open questions at seminars, conferences, publications, and other in-person or online formats; </br># publishing journal articles that propose modifications to our current knowledge and documenting these suggestions; </br># evaluating the suggested modifications with the goal of reaching a communal consensus and changing the respective encyclopedia pages when a verdict is reached.yclopedia pages when a verdict is reached.)
- Workflow - Reformulating Suggesting Modifications + (Scientonomic knowledge is best advanced by … Scientonomic knowledge is best advanced by:</br># documenting the body of accepted communal knowledge knowledge in an online encyclopedia; </br># scrutinizing this accepted knowledge, identifying its flaws, and formulating open questions at seminars, conferences, publications, and other in-person or online formats; </br># publishing journal articles that propose modifications to our current knowledge and documenting these suggestions; </br># evaluating the suggested modifications with the goal of reaching a communal consensus and changing the respective encyclopedia pages when a verdict is reached.yclopedia pages when a verdict is reached.)
- Workflow - Publishing Modification Comments + (Scientonomic knowledge is best advanced by … Scientonomic knowledge is best advanced by:</br># documenting the body of accepted communal knowledge knowledge in an online encyclopedia; </br># scrutinizing this accepted knowledge, identifying its flaws, and formulating open questions at seminars, conferences, publications, and other in-person or online formats; </br># publishing journal articles that propose modifications to our current knowledge and documenting these suggestions; </br># evaluating the suggested modifications with the goal of reaching a communal consensus and changing the respective encyclopedia pages when a verdict is reached.yclopedia pages when a verdict is reached.)
- Scientonomic Workflow (Barseghyan et al.-2016) + (Scientonomic knowledge is best advanced by … Scientonomic knowledge is best advanced by:</br># documenting the body of accepted communal knowledge in an online encyclopedia; </br># scrutinizing this accepted knowledge, identifying its flaws, and formulating open questions at seminars, conferences, publications, and other in-person or online formats; </br># publishing journal articles that propose modifications to our current knowledge and documenting these suggestions; </br># evaluating the suggested modifications with the goal of reaching a communal consensus and changing the respective encyclopedia pages when a verdict is reached.yclopedia pages when a verdict is reached.)
- Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method (Barseghyan-2015) + (Scientonomy does not postulate the existence of a universal and unchanging method of science; thus the fact that methods of science are changeable is not detrimental to the prospects of scientonomy.)
- Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method + (Scientonomy does not postulate the existence of a universal and unchanging method of science; thus the fact that methods of science are changeable is not detrimental to the prospects of scientonomy.)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Descriptive (Barseghyan-2015) + (Scientonomy is a descriptive discipline wh … Scientonomy is a descriptive discipline whose main task is to explain the process of changes in the scientific mosaic. It is distinct from normative methodology, whose task is to evaluate and prescribe methods. The findings of scientonomy may be used in such normative evaluations, but scientonomy itself should not be expected to perform any normative functions.pected to perform any normative functions.)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Descriptive and Normative + (Scientonomy is a descriptive discipline wh … Scientonomy is a descriptive discipline whose main task is to explain the process of changes in the scientific mosaic. It is distinct from normative methodology, whose task is to evaluate and prescribe methods. The findings of scientonomy may be used in such normative evaluations, but scientonomy itself should not be expected to perform any normative functions.pected to perform any normative functions.)
- Scope of Scientonomy + (Scientonomy is a descriptive discipline wh … Scientonomy is a descriptive discipline whose main task is to explain the process of changes in the scientific mosaic. It is distinct from normative methodology, whose task is to evaluate and prescribe methods. The findings of scientonomy may be used in such normative evaluations, but scientonomy itself should not be expected to perform any normative functions.pected to perform any normative functions.)
- Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015) + (Scientonomy is possible because the process of scientific change exhibits lawful general regularities.)
- Possibility of Scientonomy + (Scientonomy is possible because the process of scientific change exhibits lawful general regularities.)
- Possibility of Scientonomy - Preconditions + (Scientonomy is possible because the process of scientific change exhibits lawful general regularities.)
- Possibility of Scientonomy - The Argument from Social Construction + (Scientonomy is possible because the process of scientific change exhibits lawful general regularities.)
- Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from Bad Track Record + (Scientonomy is possible because the process of scientific change exhibits lawful general regularities.)
- Possibility of Scientonomy - The Argument from Nothing Permanent + (Scientonomy is possible because the process of scientific change exhibits lawful general regularities.)
- Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method + (Scientonomy is possible because the process of scientific change exhibits lawful general regularities.)
- Scope of Scientonomy - All Time Periods (Barseghyan-2015) + (Scientonomy ought to account for all scientific changes for all time periods where a scientific mosaic can be found.)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015) + (Scientonomy ought to address the issue of how transitions from one accepted theory to another take place and what logic governs this evolution, and need not deal in questions of theory pursuit or use.)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Acceptance Use and Pursuit + (Scientonomy ought to address the issue of how transitions from one accepted theory to another take place and what logic governs this evolution, and need not deal in questions of theory pursuit or use.)
- Scope of Scientonomy + (Scientonomy ought to address the issue of how transitions from one accepted theory to another take place and what logic governs this evolution, and need not deal in questions of theory pursuit or use.)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Time Fields and Scale + (Scientonomy should account for all changes … Scientonomy should account for all changes to the scientific mosaic, regardless of which fields of inquiry they concern. Scientonomy should provide explanations of all kinds of changes to the scientific mosaic at ''all scales'' from the most minor transitions to the most major. Scientonomy ought to account for all scientific changes for all time periods where a scientific mosaic can be found. ientific mosaic can be found. )
- Scope of Scientonomy + (Scientonomy should account for all changes … Scientonomy should account for all changes to the scientific mosaic, regardless of which fields of inquiry they concern. Scientonomy should provide explanations of all kinds of changes to the scientific mosaic at ''all scales'' from the most minor transitions to the most major. Scientonomy ought to account for all scientific changes for all time periods where a scientific mosaic can be found. ientific mosaic can be found. )
- Scope of Scientonomy - All Fields (Barseghyan-2015) + (Scientonomy should account for all changes to the scientific mosaic, regardless of which fields of inquiry they concern.)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Appraisal (Barseghyan-2015) + (Scientonomy should describe and explain ho … Scientonomy should describe and explain how changes in the mosaic of accepted scientific theories and employed methods take place. Any such instance of scientific change is a result of appraisal, which is a decision of the community to accept a proposed modification to the mosaic. Scientonomy must provide an account of this appraisal process. A theory of scientific change is not required to account for the process of theory construction.nt for the process of theory construction.)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Construction and Appraisal + (Scientonomy should describe and explain ho … Scientonomy should describe and explain how changes in the mosaic of accepted scientific theories and employed methods take place. Any such instance of scientific change is a result of appraisal, which is a decision of the community to accept a proposed modification to the mosaic. Scientonomy must provide an account of this appraisal process. A theory of scientific change is not required to account for the process of theory construction.nt for the process of theory construction.)
- Scope of Scientonomy + (Scientonomy should describe and explain ho … Scientonomy should describe and explain how changes in the mosaic of accepted scientific theories and employed methods take place. Any such instance of scientific change is a result of appraisal, which is a decision of the community to accept a proposed modification to the mosaic. Scientonomy must provide an account of this appraisal process. A theory of scientific change is not required to account for the process of theory construction.nt for the process of theory construction.)
- Scope of Scientonomy - All Scales (Barseghyan-2015) + (Scientonomy should provide explanations of all kinds of changes to the scientific mosaic at ''all scales'' from the most minor transitions to the most major.)
- Sociocultural Factors in Theory Acceptance theorem (Barseghyan-2015) + (Sociocultural factors can affect the process of theory acceptance insofar as it is permitted by the method employed at the time.)
- Role of Sociocultural Factors in Theory Acceptance + (Sociocultural factors can affect the process of theory acceptance insofar as it is permitted by the method employed at the time.)
- Role of Sociocultural Factors in Scientific Change + (Sociocultural factors can affect the process of theory acceptance insofar as it is permitted by the method employed at the time.)
- Mechanism of Scientific Change + (Sociocultural factors can affect the process of theory acceptance insofar as it is permitted by the method employed at the time.)
- Dogmatism No Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''dogmatism no theory change'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the first law, the second law, and the third law.)
- Dynamic Substantive Methods theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''dynamic substantive methods'' theorem follows from the synchronism of method rejection theorem and fallibilism.)
- Indicators of Method Employment (Barseghyan-2015) + (The ''employed method'' of theory appraisal of a community at some time is not necessarily indicated by the ''methodological texts'' of that time and must be inferred from ''actual patterns'' of theory acceptance and other ''indirect evidence''.)
- Indicators of Method Employment + (The ''employed method'' of theory appraisal of a community at some time is not necessarily indicated by the ''methodological texts'' of that time and must be inferred from ''actual patterns'' of theory acceptance and other ''indirect evidence''.)
- Local Action Availability theorem (Allen-2023) Reason1 + (The ''local action availability'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the ''law of norm employment'' and the definition of ''local action availability'')
- Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''method rejection'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the compatibility corollary and the first law.)
- Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''necessary mosaic split'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the second law and the zeroth law.)
- Non-Empty Mosaic theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''non-empty mosaic'' theorem follows deductively from the second law and the third law.)
- Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''possible mosaic split theorem'' follows as a deductive consequence of the second and zeroth laws.)
- Split Due to Inconclusiveness theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''split due to inconclusiveness'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the possible mosaic split theorem.)
- Static Procedural Methods theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''static procedural methods'' theorem follows from the method rejection theorem.)
- Synchronism of Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''synchronism of method rejection'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the method rejection theorem and the third law.)
- Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The ''theory rejection'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the compatibility corollary and the first law.)
- Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason2 + (The ''theory rejection'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the first and zeroth laws.)
- Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) + (The ability of two elements to coexist in the same mosaic.)
- Compatibility + (The ability of two elements to coexist in the same mosaic.)
- Allow Modification Reformulations (Shaw-Barseghyan-2019) + (The commentators of suggested modification … The commentators of suggested modifications are allowed to suggest reformulations of the original formulations in the comments. By default, the new formulation should bear the original author’s name, unless the author decides to give credit to those who significantly contributed to the new reformulation.ntly contributed to the new reformulation.)
- Workflow - Reformulating Suggesting Modifications + (The commentators of suggested modification … The commentators of suggested modifications are allowed to suggest reformulations of the original formulations in the comments. By default, the new formulation should bear the original author’s name, unless the author decides to give credit to those who significantly contributed to the new reformulation.ntly contributed to the new reformulation.)
- Contextual Appraisal theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The contextual appraisal theorem is a deductive consequence of the first law and the second law.)
- Workflow - Publishing Modification Comments + (The discussions concerning a suggested mod … The discussions concerning a suggested modification are to be published once a communal verdict is available. The discussions are to be published in the journal as special commentary articles co-authored by all participants of the discussion or in special edited collections.scussion or in special edited collections.)
- Publishing Modification Comments (Shaw-Barseghyan-Yan-2019) + (The discussions concerning a suggested mod … The discussions concerning a suggested modification are to be published once a communal verdict is available. The discussions are to be published in the journal as special commentary articles co-authored by all participants of the discussion or in special edited collections.scussion or in special edited collections.)
- Asynchronism of Method Employment theorem (Barseghyan-2015) + (The employment of new methods can ''be'' but is not ''necessarily'' a result of the acceptance of new theories.)
- Synchronism vs. Asynchronism of Method Employment + (The employment of new methods can ''be'' but is not ''necessarily'' a result of the acceptance of new theories.)
- Handling Ripple Effects - Editorial House Keeping (Shaw-Barseghyan-2019) + (The encyclopedia editors should be granted … The encyclopedia editors should be granted official housekeeping rights to handle the ripple effects. If the additional required changes are ''implicit'' in the suggested modification, the editors should create and alter encyclopedia pages to ensure that the accepted body of scientonomic knowledge is properly documented; if it is conceivable to accept the modification ''without'' accepting the ripple effect change in question, the editors should register these changes as new suggested modifications so that the community can discuss and evaluate them in an orderly fashion.s and evaluate them in an orderly fashion.)
- Workflow - Handling Ripple Effects + (The encyclopedia editors should be granted … The encyclopedia editors should be granted official housekeeping rights to handle the ripple effects. If the additional required changes are ''implicit'' in the suggested modification, the editors should create and alter encyclopedia pages to ensure that the accepted body of scientonomic knowledge is properly documented; if it is conceivable to accept the modification ''without'' accepting the ripple effect change in question, the editors should register these changes as new suggested modifications so that the community can discuss and evaluate them in an orderly fashion.s and evaluate them in an orderly fashion.)
- Response to the Argument from Bad Track Record (Barseghyan-2015) + (The failures of past theories of scientific change do not imply the inevitability of future failure or that the enterprise in inherently unsound.)
- Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from Bad Track Record + (The failures of past theories of scientific change do not imply the inevitability of future failure or that the enterprise in inherently unsound.)
- The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The first law for methods suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 is tautological.)
- The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The first law for norms suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 is tautological.)
- The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The first law for questions suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 is tautological.)
- The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The first law for theories suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 is tautological.)
- The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The first law for theories suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 is tautological.)
- The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The first law suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 is tautological.)
- Goals of Peer Review - Pursuitworthiness (Shaw-Barseghyan-2019) + (The goal of peer reviews in the scientonomic workflow is evaluation for ''pursuitworthiness'' rather than ''acceptability''.)
- Workflow - Goals of Peer Review + (The goal of peer reviews in the scientonomic workflow is evaluation for ''pursuitworthiness'' rather than ''acceptability''.)
- Error Rejection by Replacement (Machado-Marques-Patton-2021) + (The handling of instances of scientific error is consistent with the theory rejection theorem; it involves a replacement of an erroneously accepted theory either with a first- or second-order proposition.)
- Mechanism of Error Rejection + (The handling of instances of scientific error is consistent with the theory rejection theorem; it involves a replacement of an erroneously accepted theory either with a first- or second-order proposition.)
- The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) is Not Tautological (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) + (The law of compatibility suggested by Fraser and Sarwar in 2018 is not tautological.)
- Tautological Status of The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) + (The law of compatibility suggested by Fraser and Sarwar in 2018 is not tautological.)
- The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) is Not Tautological (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) + (The law of theory demarcation as formulated by Sarwar and Fraser in 2018 is not tautological.)
- Individual Level (Barseghyan-2015) + (The level of the beliefs of the individual scientist about the world and the rules she employs in theory assessment.)
- Individual Level + (The level of the beliefs of the individual scientist about the world and the rules she employs in theory assessment.)
- Social Level (Barseghyan-2015) + (The level of the scientific community and its mosaic of accepted theories and employed methods.)
- Social Level + (The level of the scientific community and its mosaic of accepted theories and employed methods.)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Methods - Employment (Barseghyan-2015) + (The list of possible stances towards a method is limited to ''employment''.)
- Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The method rejection theorem suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 is tautological.)
- Necessary Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 + (The necessary method theorem is a deductive consequence of the the second and third laws.)
- Resolution to the Paradox of Normative Propositions (Sebastien-2016) + (The new third law resolves the paradox of normative propositions by making it clear that employed methods don't necessarily follow from ''all'' accepted theories, but only from ''some''.)
- The Paradox of Normative Propositions + (The new third law resolves the paradox of normative propositions by making it clear that employed methods don't necessarily follow from ''all'' accepted theories, but only from ''some''.)
- Norm Rejection theorem (Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The norm rejection theorem suggested by Pandey in 2023 is tautological.)
- Theory Assessment Outcomes (Barseghyan-2015) + (The possible outcomes of theory assessment are ''accept'', ''not accept'', and ''inconclusive''.)
- Theory Assessment Outcomes (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) + (The possible outcomes of theory assessment are ''satisfied'', ''not satisfied'', and ''inconclusive''.)
- Theory Assessment Outcomes + (The possible outcomes of theory assessment are ''satisfied'', ''not satisfied'', and ''inconclusive''.)
- Ontology of Scientific Change + (The possible outcomes of theory assessment are ''satisfied'', ''not satisfied'', and ''inconclusive''.)
- Conclusive Theory Assessment + (The possible outcomes of theory assessment are ''satisfied'', ''not satisfied'', and ''inconclusive''.)
- Underdetermined Method Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015) + (The process of method change is not necessarily deterministic: employed methods are by no means the only possible implementations of abstract requirements.)
- Underdetermined Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015) + (The process of theory change is not necessarily deterministic: there may be cases when both a theory's acceptance and its unacceptance are equally possible.)
- Question Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Levesley-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The question rejection theorem suggested by Barseghyan, Levesley, and Pandey in 2023 is tautological.)
- Question Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The question rejection theorem suggested by Barseghyan and Levesley in 2021 is tautological.)
- The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) is Not Tautological (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) + (The second law suggested by Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan in 2017 is not tautological.)
- Tautological Status of The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) + (The second law suggested by Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan in 2017 is not tautological.)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) + (The stance of [[Compatibility|compatibility]] can be taken towards an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements + (The stance of [[Compatibility|compatibility]] can be taken towards an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Theories + (The stance of [[Compatibility|compatibility]] can be taken towards an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Questions + (The stance of [[Compatibility|compatibility]] can be taken towards an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Ontology of Scientific Change + (The stance of [[Compatibility|compatibility]] can be taken towards an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Definitions + (The stance of [[Compatibility|compatibility]] can be taken towards an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Pursuit and Acceptance + (The stance of [[Compatibility|compatibility]] can be taken towards an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Descriptive Theories + (The stance of [[Compatibility|compatibility]] can be taken towards an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Normative Theories + (The stance of [[Compatibility|compatibility]] can be taken towards an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Normative Theories - Norm Employment (Barseghyan-2018) + (The stance of [[Norm Employment|norm employment]] can be taken towards a [[Normative Theory|normative theory]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Normative Theories + (The stance of [[Norm Employment|norm employment]] can be taken towards a [[Normative Theory|normative theory]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Methods + (The stance of [[Norm Employment|norm employment]] can be taken towards a [[Normative Theory|normative theory]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Questions - Question Acceptance (Rawleigh-2018) + (The stance of [[Question Acceptance|question acceptance]] can be taken towards a [[Question|question]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Questions + (The stance of [[Question Acceptance|question acceptance]] can be taken towards a [[Question|question]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Scientificity (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) + (The stance of [[Scientificity|scientificity]] can be taken towards a [[Theory|theory]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015) + (The stance of [[Theory Acceptance|theory acceptance]] can be taken towards a [[Theory|theory]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015) + (The stance of [[Theory Pursuit|theory pursuit]] can be taken towards a [[Theory|theory]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Use (Barseghyan-2015) + (The stance of [[Theory Use|theory use]] can be taken towards a [[Theory|theory]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Methods + (The stance of compatibility can be taken towards an epistemic element.)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Theories + (The stances of [[Theory Acceptance|theory acceptance]], [[Theory Pursuit|theory pursuit]] and [[Theory Use|theory use]] can be taken towards a [[Theory|theory]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Definitions + (The stances of [[Theory Acceptance|theory acceptance]], [[Theory Pursuit|theory pursuit]] and [[Theory Use|theory use]] can be taken towards a [[Theory|theory]].)
- Pursuit and Acceptance + (The stances of [[Theory Acceptance|theory acceptance]], [[Theory Pursuit|theory pursuit]] and [[Theory Use|theory use]] can be taken towards a [[Theory|theory]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Normative Theories + (The stances of [[Theory Acceptance|theory acceptance]], [[Theory Pursuit|theory pursuit]] and [[Theory Use|theory use]] can be taken towards a [[Theory|theory]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Descriptive Theories + (The stances of [[Theory Acceptance|theory acceptance]], [[Theory Pursuit|theory pursuit]] and [[Theory Use|theory use]] can be taken towards a [[Theory|theory]].)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Methods + (The stances of [[Theory Acceptance|theory acceptance]], [[Theory Pursuit|theory pursuit]] and [[Theory Use|theory use]] can be taken towards a [[Theory|theory]].)
- Subtypes of Epistemic Agent + (The subtypes of [[Epistemic Agent|epistemic agent]] are [[Epistemic Community|epistemic community]] and [[Individual Epistemic Agent|individual epistemic agent]].)
- Ontology of Scientific Change + (The subtypes of [[Epistemic Agent|epistemic agent]] are [[Epistemic Community|epistemic community]] and [[Individual Epistemic Agent|individual epistemic agent]].)
- Subtypes of Epistemic Element + (The subtypes of [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]] are [[Explicit|explicit]], [[Implicit|implicit]], [[Question|question]] and [[Theory|theory]].)
- Ontology of Scientific Change + (The subtypes of [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]] are [[Explicit|explicit]], [[Implicit|implicit]], [[Question|question]] and [[Theory|theory]].)
- Subtypes of Epistemic Stance + (The subtypes of [[Epistemic Stance|epistemic stance]] … The subtypes of [[Epistemic Stance|epistemic stance]] are [[Compatibility|compatibility]], [[Norm Employment|norm employment]], [[Question Acceptance|question acceptance]], [[Theory Acceptance|theory acceptance]], [[Theory Pursuit|theory pursuit]] and [[Theory Use|theory use]].[[Theory Use|theory use]].)
- Ontology of Scientific Change + (The subtypes of [[Epistemic Stance|epistemic stance]] … The subtypes of [[Epistemic Stance|epistemic stance]] are [[Compatibility|compatibility]], [[Norm Employment|norm employment]], [[Question Acceptance|question acceptance]], [[Theory Acceptance|theory acceptance]], [[Theory Pursuit|theory pursuit]] and [[Theory Use|theory use]].[[Theory Use|theory use]].)
- Subtypes of Theory + (The subtypes of [[Theory|theory]] are [[Definition|definition]], [[Descriptive Theory|descriptive theory]] and [[Normative Theory|normative theory]].)
- Outcome Satisfied (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) + (The theory is deemed to conclusively meet the requirements of the method employed at the time.)
- Outcome Satisfied + (The theory is deemed to conclusively meet the requirements of the method employed at the time.)
- Outcome Not Satisfied (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) + (The theory is deemed to conclusively not meet the requirements of the method employed at the time.)
- Outcome Not Satisfied + (The theory is deemed to conclusively not meet the requirements of the method employed at the time.)
- Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The theory rejection theorem suggested by Barseghyan and Pandey in 2023 is tautological.)
- Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Pandey-2023) + (The theory rejection theorem suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 is tautological.)
- Closure Mechanism - Time Limit and Communal Vote (Shaw-Barseghyan-2019) + (The verdict on a suggested modification should be decided by a communal vote that will follow the discussion period.)
- Contextual Appraisal theorem (Barseghyan-2015) + (Theory assessment is an assessment of a proposed modification of the mosaic by the method employed at the time.)
- Nature of Appraisal + (Theory assessment is an assessment of a proposed modification of the mosaic by the method employed at the time.)
- Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance or Unacceptance of Two Contenders (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) + (There is a series of inferences that can be made from the acceptance or unacceptance of two contender theories.)
- Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance or Unacceptance of a Single Contender (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) + (There is a series of inferences that can be made from the acceptance or unacceptance of a single contender.)
- Community Does Not Exist + (There is no such thing as a [[Community|community]].)
- Element Decay Exists + (There is such a thing as [[Element Decay|element decay]].)
- Norm Employment Exists + (There is such a thing as [[Norm Employment|norm employment]].)
- Question Acceptance Exists + (There is such a thing as [[Question Acceptance|question acceptance]].)
- Existence of Question Acceptance + (There is such a thing as [[Question Acceptance|question acceptance]].)
- Theory Acceptance Exists + (There is such a thing as [[Theory Acceptance|theory acceptance]].)
- Existence of Theory Acceptance + (There is such a thing as [[Theory Acceptance|theory acceptance]].)
- Theory Decay Exists + (There is such a thing as [[Theory Decay|theory decay]].)
- Community Exists + (There is such a thing as a [[Community|community]].)
- Existence of Community + (There is such a thing as a [[Community|community]].)
- Definition Exists + (There is such a thing as a [[Definition|definition]].)
- Existence of Definition + (There is such a thing as a [[Definition|definition]].)
- Descriptive Theory Exists + (There is such a thing as a [[Descriptive Theory|descriptive theory]].)
- Existence of Descriptive Theory + (There is such a thing as a [[Descriptive Theory|descriptive theory]].)
- Global Epistemic Action Exists + (There is such a thing as a [[Global Epistemic Action|global epistemic action]].)
- Local Epistemic Action Exists + (There is such a thing as a [[Local Epistemic Action|local epistemic action]].)
- Logical Presupposition Exists + (There is such a thing as a [[Logical Presupposition|logical presupposition]].)
- Existence of Logical Presupposition + (There is such a thing as a [[Logical Presupposition|logical presupposition]].)
- Method Hierarchy Exists + (There is such a thing as a [[Method Hierarchy|method hierarchy]].)
- Normative Theory Exists + (There is such a thing as a [[Normative Theory|normative theory]].)
- Existence of Normative Theory + (There is such a thing as a [[Normative Theory|normative theory]].)
- Question Exists + (There is such a thing as a [[Question|question]].)
- Existence of Question + (There is such a thing as a [[Question|question]].)
- Theory Exists + (There is such a thing as a [[Theory|theory]].)
- Existence of Theory + (There is such a thing as a [[Theory|theory]].)
- Epistemic Presupposition Exists + (There is such a thing as an [[Epistemic Presupposition|epistemic presupposition]].)
- Existence of Epistemic Presupposition + (There is such a thing as an [[Epistemic Presupposition|epistemic presupposition]].)
- Epistemic Community Exists + (There is such a thing as an [[Epistemic Community|epistemic community]].)
- Existence of Epistemic Community + (There is such a thing as an [[Epistemic Community|epistemic community]].)
- Epistemic Action Exists + (There is such a thing as an [[Epistemic Action|epistemic action]].)
- Epistemic Agent Exists + (There is such a thing as an [[Epistemic Agent|epistemic agent]].)
- Existence of Epistemic Agent + (There is such a thing as an [[Epistemic Agent|epistemic agent]].)
- Epistemic Element Exists + (There is such a thing as an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Existence of Epistemic Element + (There is such a thing as an [[Epistemic Element|epistemic element]].)
- Epistemic Stance Exists + (There is such a thing as an [[Epistemic Stance|epistemic stance]].)
- Existence of Epistemic Stance + (There is such a thing as an [[Epistemic Stance|epistemic stance]].)
- Individual Epistemic Agent Exists + (There is such a thing as an [[Individual Epistemic Agent|individual epistemic agent]].)
- Existence of Individual Epistemic Agent + (There is such a thing as an [[Individual Epistemic Agent|individual epistemic agent]].)
- Scientific Underdeterminism theorem (Barseghyan-2015) + (Transitions from one state of the mosaic to another are not necessarily deterministic. Scientific change is not a strictly deterministic process.)
- Determinism vs. Underdeterminism in Scientific Change + (Transitions from one state of the mosaic t … Transitions from one state of the mosaic to another are not necessarily deterministic. Scientific change is not a strictly deterministic process. The process of method change is not necessarily deterministic: employed methods are by no means the only possible implementations of abstract requirements. The process of theory change is not necessarily deterministic: there may be cases when both a theory's acceptance and its unacceptance are equally possible. eptance are equally possible. )
- Mechanism of Scientific Change + (Transitions from one state of the mosaic t … Transitions from one state of the mosaic to another are not necessarily deterministic. Scientific change is not a strictly deterministic process. The process of method change is not necessarily deterministic: employed methods are by no means the only possible implementations of abstract requirements. The process of theory change is not necessarily deterministic: there may be cases when both a theory's acceptance and its unacceptance are equally possible. eptance are equally possible. )
- Group (Overgaard-2017) + (Two or more people who share any characteristic.)
- Group + (Two or more people who share any characteristic.)
- Split Due to Inconclusiveness theorem (Barseghyan-2015) + (When a mosaic split is a result of the acceptance of only one theory, it can only be a result of inconclusive theory assessment.)
- Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) + (When a theory assessment outcome is inconclusive, a mosaic split is possible.)
- Mechanism of Mosaic Split + (When two mutually incompatible theories sa … When two mutually incompatible theories satisfy the requirements of the current method, the mosaic necessarily splits in two. When a theory assessment outcome is inconclusive, a mosaic split is possible. When a mosaic split is a result of the acceptance of only one theory, it can only be a result of inconclusive theory assessment. conclusive theory assessment. )
- Mechanism of Scientific Change + (When two mutually incompatible theories sa … When two mutually incompatible theories satisfy the requirements of the current method, the mosaic necessarily splits in two. When a theory assessment outcome is inconclusive, a mosaic split is possible. When a mosaic split is a result of the acceptance of only one theory, it can only be a result of inconclusive theory assessment. conclusive theory assessment. )
- Indicators of Inconclusiveness + (When two mutually incompatible theories sa … When two mutually incompatible theories satisfy the requirements of the current method, the mosaic necessarily splits in two. When a theory assessment outcome is inconclusive, a mosaic split is possible. When a mosaic split is a result of the acceptance of only one theory, it can only be a result of inconclusive theory assessment. conclusive theory assessment. )
- Role of Sociocultural Factors in Mosaic Split + (When two mutually incompatible theories sa … When two mutually incompatible theories satisfy the requirements of the current method, the mosaic necessarily splits in two. When a theory assessment outcome is inconclusive, a mosaic split is possible. When a mosaic split is a result of the acceptance of only one theory, it can only be a result of inconclusive theory assessment. conclusive theory assessment. )
- Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) + (When two mutually incompatible theories satisfy the requirements of the current method, the mosaic necessarily splits in two.)
- Compatibility Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) + ([[Compatibility]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Stance]], i.e. epistemic stance is a supertype of compatibility.)
- Supertypes of Compatibility + ([[Compatibility]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Stance]], i.e. epistemic stance is a supertype of compatibility.)
- Definition Is a Subtype of Theory (Barseghyan-2018) + ([[Definition]] is a subtype of [[Theory]], i.e. theory is a supertype of definition.)
- Supertypes of Definition + ([[Definition]] is a subtype of [[Theory]], i.e. theory is a supertype of definition.)
- Descriptive Theory Is a Subtype of Theory (Barseghyan-2015) + ([[Descriptive Theory]] is a subtype of [[Theory]], i.e. theory is a supertype of descriptive theory.)
- Supertypes of Descriptive Theory + ([[Descriptive Theory]] is a subtype of [[Theory]], i.e. theory is a supertype of descriptive theory.)
- Element Decay Is a Non-Scientonomic Phenomenon (Oh-2021) + ([[Element Decay|Element Decay]] is a non-scientonomic phenomenon.)
- Epistemic Community Is a Subtype of Epistemic Agent (Barseghyan-2018) + ([[Epistemic Community]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Agent]], i.e. epistemic agent is a supertype of epistemic community.)
- Supertypes of Epistemic Community + ([[Epistemic Community]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Agent]], i.e. epistemic agent is a supertype of epistemic community.)
- Explicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018) + ([[Explicit]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Element]], i.e. epistemic element is a supertype of explicit.)
- Supertypes of Explicit + ([[Explicit]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Element]], i.e. epistemic element is a supertype of explicit.)
- Global Epistemic Action Is a Subtype of Epistemic Action (Allen-2023) + ([[Global Epistemic Action]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Action]], i.e. epistemic action is a supertype of global epistemic action.)
- Hierarchical Authority Delegation Is a Subtype of Authority Delegation (Loiselle-2017) + ([[Hierarchical Authority Delegation]] is a subtype of [[Authority Delegation]], i.e. authority delegation is a supertype of hierarchical authority delegation.)
- Implicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018) + ([[Implicit]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Element]], i.e. epistemic element is a supertype of implicit.)
- Supertypes of Implicit + ([[Implicit]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Element]], i.e. epistemic element is a supertype of implicit.)
- Individual Epistemic Agent Is a Subtype of Epistemic Agent (Patton-2019) + ([[Individual Epistemic Agent]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Agent]], i.e. epistemic agent is a supertype of individual epistemic agent.)
- Supertypes of Individual Epistemic Agent + ([[Individual Epistemic Agent]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Agent]], i.e. epistemic agent is a supertype of individual epistemic agent.)
- Local Epistemic Action Is a Subtype of Epistemic Action (Allen-2023) + ([[Local Epistemic Action]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Action]], i.e. epistemic action is a supertype of local epistemic action.)
- Method Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Barseghyan-2015) + ([[Method]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Element]], i.e. epistemic element is a supertype of method.)
- Method Is a Subtype of Normative Theory (Barseghyan-2018) + ([[Method]] is a subtype of [[Normative Theory]], i.e. normative theory is a supertype of method.)
- Subtypes of Normative Theory + ([[Method]] is a subtype of [[Normative Theory]], i.e. normative theory is a supertype of method.)
- Supertypes of Method + ([[Method]] is a subtype of [[Normative Theory]], i.e. normative theory is a supertype of method.)
- Norm Employment Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2018) + ([[Norm Employment]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Stance]], i.e. epistemic stance is a supertype of norm employment.)
- Supertypes of Norm Employment + ([[Norm Employment]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Stance]], i.e. epistemic stance is a supertype of norm employment.)
- Normative Theory Is a Subtype of Theory (Sebastien-2016) + ([[Normative Theory]] is a subtype of [[Theory]], i.e. theory is a supertype of normative theory.)
- Supertypes of Normative Theory + ([[Normative Theory]] is a subtype of [[Theory]], i.e. theory is a supertype of normative theory.)
- Outcome Accept Is a Subtype of Outcome Inconclusive (Delaney-2022) + ([[Outcome Accept]] is a subtype of [[Outcome Inconclusive]], i.e. outcome inconclusive is a supertype of outcome accept.)
- Question Acceptance Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Rawleigh-2018) + ([[Question Acceptance]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Stance]], i.e. epistemic stance is a supertype of question acceptance.)
- Supertypes of Question Acceptance + ([[Question Acceptance]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Stance]], i.e. epistemic stance is a supertype of question acceptance.)
- Question Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Rawleigh-2018) + ([[Question]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Element]], i.e. epistemic element is a supertype of question.)
- Supertypes of Question + ([[Question]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Element]], i.e. epistemic element is a supertype of question.)
- Scientificity Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) + ([[Scientificity]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Stance]], i.e. epistemic stance is a supertype of scientificity.)
- Theory Acceptance Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015) + ([[Theory Acceptance]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Stance]], i.e. epistemic stance is a supertype of theory acceptance.)
- Supertypes of Theory Acceptance + ([[Theory Acceptance]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Stance]], i.e. epistemic stance is a supertype of theory acceptance.)
- Theory Decay Is a Subtype of Element Decay (Oh-2021) + ([[Theory Decay]] is a subtype of [[Element Decay]], i.e. element decay is a supertype of theory decay.)
- Theory Pursuit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015) + ([[Theory Pursuit]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Stance]], i.e. epistemic stance is a supertype of theory pursuit.)
- Supertypes of Theory Pursuit + ([[Theory Pursuit]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Stance]], i.e. epistemic stance is a supertype of theory pursuit.)
- Theory Use Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015) + ([[Theory Use]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Stance]], i.e. epistemic stance is a supertype of theory use.)
- Supertypes of Theory Use + ([[Theory Use]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Stance]], i.e. epistemic stance is a supertype of theory use.)
- Theory Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Barseghyan-2015) + ([[Theory]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Element]], i.e. epistemic element is a supertype of theory.)
- Supertypes of Theory + ([[Theory]] is a subtype of [[Epistemic Element]], i.e. epistemic element is a supertype of theory.)