Test
- Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015)
- Epistemic Community Is a Subtype of Epistemic Agent (Barseghyan-2018) and Individual Epistemic Agent Is a Subtype of Epistemic Agent (Patton-2019)
- Explicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018), Implicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018), Question Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Rawleigh-2018) and Theory Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Barseghyan-2015)
- Compatibility Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Fraser-Sarwar-2018), Norm Employment Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2018), Question Acceptance Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Rawleigh-2018), Theory Acceptance Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015), Theory Pursuit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015) and Theory Use Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015)
- The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)
- The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015)
- The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
- The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
- The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)
- The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
- Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Explicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018)
- Substantive Method (Barseghyan-2015)
- Methodology Can Shape Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Demarcation Criteria (Barseghyan-2015)
- Theory Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Barseghyan-2015)
- The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Barseghyan-2015)
- Epistemic Community Exists
- Acceptance Criteria (Barseghyan-2015)
- Norm Employment Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2018)
- Scope of Scientonomy - All Fields (Barseghyan-2015), Scope of Scientonomy - All Scales (Barseghyan-2015) and Scope of Scientonomy - All Time Periods (Barseghyan-2015)
- Logical Presupposition (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021)
- Indicators of Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015)
- Question Can Presuppose Theories (Barseghyan-Levesley-2019) and Theory Answers Question (Rawleigh-2018)
- Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015)
- Outcome Inconclusive (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
- Handling Ripple Effects - Editorial House Keeping (Shaw-Barseghyan-2019)
- Group (Overgaard-2017)
- Necessary Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Question Acceptance Exists
- Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2018)
- Definition Is a Subtype of Theory (Barseghyan-2018)
- The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) is Not Tautological (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
- Mutual Authority Delegation (Patton-2019)
- Community (Overgaard-2017)
- Implicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018)
- Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015), Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) and Split Due to Inconclusiveness theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- One-sided Authority Delegation (Patton-2019)
- Community Can Delegate Authority to Another Community (Loiselle-Overgaard-2016)
- Epistemic Agent (Patton-2019)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Questions - Question Acceptance (Rawleigh-2018)
- Scientific Underdeterminism theorem (Barseghyan-2015), Underdetermined Method Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015) and Underdetermined Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Inexplicable (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)
- Logical Presupposition Exists
- Scope of Scientonomy - Social (Barseghyan-2015)
- Question Exists
- Normative Theory (Sebastien-2016)
- Descriptive Theory Exists
- Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method (Barseghyan-2015)
- Social Level (Barseghyan-2015)
- Pursuit as Distinct from Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015)
- Epistemic Agent Exists
- Synchronism of Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Procedural Method (Barseghyan-2015)
- Scientific Change (Barseghyan-2015)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015), Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015) and Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Use (Barseghyan-2015)
- Asynchronism of Method Employment theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Theory Acceptance Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015)
- Error (Machado-Marques-Patton-2021)
- Compatibility Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
- The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) is Not Tautological (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
- Explicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)
- Definition (Barseghyan-2018)
- Theory Use Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015)
- Indicators of Method Employment (Barseghyan-2015)
- Multiple Authority Delegation (Patton-2019)
- Normative Theory Exists
- Mosaic Merge (Barseghyan-2015)
- Goals of Peer Review - Pursuitworthiness (Shaw-Barseghyan-2019)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Implicit and Explicit (Barseghyan-2017)
- Question Acceptance (Rawleigh-2018)
- Epistemic Community Is a Subtype of Epistemic Agent (Barseghyan-2018)
- Error Rejection by Replacement (Machado-Marques-Patton-2021)
- Theory Pursuit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015)
- Method (Barseghyan-2018)
- Question Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Rawleigh-2018)
- Theory Assessment Outcomes (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
- Compatibility Criteria (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
- Theory Acceptance Exists
- Scope of Scientonomy - Descriptive (Barseghyan-2015)
- Hierarchical Authority Delegation (Patton-2019)
- Epistemic Presupposition (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021)
- Response to the Argument from Bad Track Record (Barseghyan-2015)
- Definition Exists
- Accidental Group (Overgaard-2017)
- Descriptive Theory Is a Subtype of Theory (Barseghyan-2015)
- Compatibility Corollary (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
- Explicable-Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)
- Descriptive Theory (Sebastien-2016)
- Normative Theory Is a Subtype of Theory (Sebastien-2016)
- Response to the Argument from Nothing Permanent (Barseghyan-2015)
- History of Scientific Change (Barseghyan-2015)
- Question Acceptance Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Rawleigh-2018)
- Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)
- Publishing Modification Comments (Shaw-Barseghyan-2019)
- Response to the Argument from Social Construction (Barseghyan-2015)
- Singular Authority Delegation (Patton-2019)
- Definition Is a Subtype of Theory (Barseghyan-2018), Descriptive Theory Is a Subtype of Theory (Barseghyan-2015) and Normative Theory Is a Subtype of Theory (Sebastien-2016)
- Technological Knowledge as Part of Mosaic (Mirkin-2018)
- Method Is a Subtype of Normative Theory (Barseghyan-2018)
- Authority Delegation (Patton-2019)
- Theory Exists
- Assessment of Scientonomy - Relevant Facts (Barseghyan-2015)
- Mosaic Split (Barseghyan-2015)
- Community Exists
- The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) is Tautological (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
- Outcome Not Satisfied (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
- Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Normative Theories - Norm Employment (Barseghyan-2018)
- Scientonomic Workflow (Barseghyan et al.-2016)
- Epistemic Presupposition Exists
- Outcome Satisfied (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
- Individual Epistemic Agent Exists
- Theory Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015)
- Question (Rawleigh-2018)
- Epistemic Stance Exists
- Scope of Scientonomy - Appraisal (Barseghyan-2015)
- Scientific Mosaic (Barseghyan-2018)
- Sociocultural Factors in Theory Acceptance theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Individual Epistemic Agent Is a Subtype of Epistemic Agent (Patton-2019)
- Norm Employment (Barseghyan-2018)
- Allow Modification Reformulations (Shaw-Barseghyan-2019)
- Theory Use (Barseghyan-2015)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015)
- Epistemic Element Exists
- Individual Level (Barseghyan-2015)
- Question Can Presuppose Theories (Barseghyan-Levesley-2019) and Theory Answers Question (Rawleigh-2018)
- Resolution to the Paradox of Normative Propositions (Sebastien-2016)
- Methodology (Barseghyan-2018)
- Theory (Sebastien-2016)
- Method Is a Subtype of Normative Theory (Barseghyan-2018)
- Dogmatism No Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Non-Hierarchical Authority Delegation (Patton-2019)
- The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)
- The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)
- The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)
- The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015)
- The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
- The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
- The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
- The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)
- The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)
- The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)
- The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)
- The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)
- The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)
- The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)
- The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
- The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
- Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015), Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015) and Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Use (Barseghyan-2015)
- Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015)
- Scientonomic Workflow (Barseghyan et al.-2016)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Implicit and Explicit (Barseghyan-2017)
- Scientonomic Workflow (Barseghyan et al.-2016)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015), Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015) and Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Use (Barseghyan-2015)
- Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015)
- Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015), Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) and Split Due to Inconclusiveness theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Theory Assessment Outcomes (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015), Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015) and Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Use (Barseghyan-2015)
- Scientonomic Workflow (Barseghyan et al.-2016)
- Scientonomic Workflow (Barseghyan et al.-2016)
- Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015)
- Scientonomic Workflow (Barseghyan et al.-2016)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Normative Theories - Norm Employment (Barseghyan-2018)
- Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015), Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) and Split Due to Inconclusiveness theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015), Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015) and Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Use (Barseghyan-2015)
- Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015)
- Assessment of Scientonomy - Relevant Facts (Barseghyan-2015)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015), Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015) and Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Use (Barseghyan-2015)
- Technological Knowledge as Part of Mosaic (Mirkin-2018)
- Epistemic Community Is a Subtype of Epistemic Agent (Barseghyan-2018) and Individual Epistemic Agent Is a Subtype of Epistemic Agent (Patton-2019)
- Question Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Rawleigh-2018), Theory Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Barseghyan-2015), Explicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018) and Implicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018)
- Theory Acceptance Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015), Norm Employment Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2018), Question Acceptance Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Rawleigh-2018), Compatibility Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Fraser-Sarwar-2018), Theory Use Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015) and Theory Pursuit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Barseghyan-2015)
- The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)
- The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015)
- Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements - Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
- The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
- The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)
- The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)
- The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
- Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Appraisal (Barseghyan-2015)
- Sociocultural Factors in Theory Acceptance theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Implicit and Explicit (Barseghyan-2017)
- Sociocultural Factors in Theory Acceptance theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Descriptive (Barseghyan-2015)
- Necessary Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Social (Barseghyan-2015)
- Theory Assessment Outcomes (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
- Scope of Scientonomy - All Fields (Barseghyan-2015), Scope of Scientonomy - All Scales (Barseghyan-2015) and Scope of Scientonomy - All Time Periods (Barseghyan-2015)
- Underdetermined Method Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015), Underdetermined Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015) and Scientific Underdeterminism theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Dogmatism No Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Necessary Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Assessment of Scientonomy - Relevant Facts (Barseghyan-2015)
- Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015), Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) and Split Due to Inconclusiveness theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Necessary Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
- Scope of Scientonomy - Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015)
- Methodology Can Shape Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
Current answers to Epistemic Stances Towards Theories are: The stances of theory acceptance, theory pursuit and theory use can be taken towards a theory.
Current answers to Epistemic Stances Towards Questions are: The stance of question acceptance can be taken towards a question.
Current answers to Mechanism of Mosaic Split are: When two mutually incompatible theories satisfy the requirements of the current method, the mosaic necessarily splits in two. When a theory assessment outcome is inconclusive, a mosaic split is possible. When a mosaic split is a result of the acceptance of only one theory, it can only be a result of inconclusive theory assessment.
Template:SetTopicHasAcceptedAnswer Temp
In Scientonomy, the accepted answers to the question are The First Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017), The Third Law (Sebastien-2016), The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018), Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015), Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015), Dogmatism No Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015), Sociocultural Factors in Theory Acceptance theorem (Barseghyan-2015), Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015), Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015), Split Due to Inconclusiveness theorem (Barseghyan-2015), Underdetermined Method Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015), Underdetermined Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015), Scientific Underdeterminism theorem (Barseghyan-2015) and Methodology Can Shape Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015).
---
Heritable Questions of Descriptive Theory:
Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Descriptive Theories
The question has no accepted answer.
Necessary Descriptive Theories
The question has no accepted answer.
Subsumes items of Epistemic Stance: Compatibility, Epistemic Stance, Norm Employment, Question Acceptance, Theory Acceptance, Theory Pursuit, Theory Use
Questions of subsumes items of Epistemic Stance: Mechanism of Norm Employment, Mechanism of Question Acceptance, Mechanism of Theory Acceptance
Children Array: Question, Theory, Explicit and Implicit
---
Question, Theory, Explicit, Implicit
Question, Theory, Explicit and Implicit
Subsumes Items of Epistemic Element: Definition, Descriptive Theory, Epistemic Element, Explicit, Implicit, Method, Normative Theory, Question, Theory
Descendant Items of Epistemic Element: Definition, Descriptive Theory, Explicit, Implicit, Method, Normative Theory, Question, Theory
Ancestor Items of Method: Epistemic Element, Normative Theory, Theory
Subsumed Items of Method: Epistemic Element, Method, Normative Theory, Theory
Answers to the subquestions of Epistemic Element:
Epistemic Stances
This a test string that contains all the forms, including lowercase <subject>, <subjects>, and <a subject>, as well as capitalized <Subject>, <Subjects>, and <a Subject>. It does that several times for the sake of testing. Here they are again: <subject>, <subjects>, and <a subject>, as well as capitalized <Subject>, <Subjects>, and <a Subject>.
This a test string that contains all the forms, including lowercase epistemic element, theory, theory acceptance, theory use and some random text, epistemic elements, theories, instances of theory acceptance, instances of theory use and some random texts, and an epistemic element, a theory, theory acceptance, theory use and a some random text, as well as capitalized Epistemic Element, Theory, Theory Acceptance, Theory Use and Some random text, Epistemic Elements, Theories, Instances of Theory Acceptance, Instances of Theory Use and Some random texts, and an Epistemic Element, a Theory, Theory Acceptance, Theory Use and a Some random text. It does that several times for the sake of testing. Here they are again: epistemic element, theory, theory acceptance, theory use and some random text, epistemic elements, theories, instances of theory acceptance, instances of theory use and some random texts, and an epistemic element, a theory, theory acceptance, theory use and a some random text, as well as capitalized Epistemic Element, Theory, Theory Acceptance, Theory Use and Some random text, Epistemic Elements, Theories, Instances of Theory Acceptance, Instances of Theory Use and Some random texts, and an Epistemic Element, a Theory, Theory Acceptance, Theory Use and a Some random text.
Epistemic Stances Towards Epistemic Elements
What epistemic elements can the stance of theory acceptance be taken towards?
Epistemic Stances
varTemp: Some text and some other text.
AnASLow: a method
AnASLow: a some word
AnASLow: an empty word
AnASCap: a Method
AnASCap: a Some word
AnASCap: an Empty word
SCap: Method
SLow: method
PCap: Epsitemic Stances, Methods, Theories, Instances of Theory Acceptance, Some other terms and Random texts
PLow: epistemic elements, methods, theories, instances of theory acceptance, some other terms and random texts
The following subtypes of Epistemic Element are currently accepted in Scientonomy:
- The main subtypes of Epistemic Element are Question and Theory.
- On the basis of explicitness, the subtypes of Epistemic Element are Explicit and Implicit.
The following subtypes of Epistemic Element are currently accepted in Scientonomy. The main subtypes of Epistemic Element are Question and Theory. On the basis of explicitness, the subtypes of Epistemic Element are Explicit and Implicit.
Hello World!
Formulated Year | Authors List | Child | Disjoint Group | Disjoint Group Order | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Method Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Barseghyan-2015) | 2015 | Hakob Barseghyan | Method | Main | 1 |
Question Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Rawleigh-2018) | 2018 | William Rawleigh | Question | Main | 1 |
Theory Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Barseghyan-2015) | 2015 | Hakob Barseghyan | Theory | Main | 1 |
Explicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018) | 2018 | Maxim Mirkin | Explicit | explicitness | 2 |
Implicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018) | 2018 | Maxim Mirkin | Implicit | explicitness | 2 |
Main,explicitness
Question Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Rawleigh-2018), Theory Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Barseghyan-2015), Explicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018) and Implicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018)
Compatibility Criteria (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)
There are several options here: One, Two, Three and Four.
There is only one option: One There are no options.
Like demarcation and acceptance criteria, compatibility criteria can be part of an epistemic agent's employed method. An epistemic agent employs these criteria to determine whether two elements (e.g. methods, theories, questions) are mutually compatible or incompatible, i.e. whether they can be simultaneously part of the agent's mosaic. In principle, these criteria can be employed to determine the compatibility of elements present in the mosaic, as well as those outside of it (e.g. scientists often think about whether a proposed theory is compatible with the theories actually accepted at the time). Fraser and Sarwar point out that Barseghyan's original definition of the term "excludes a simple point that is assumed elsewhere in scientonomy: elements other than theories (i.e. methods and questions) may be compatible or incompatible with other elements (which, again, need not be theories)".p. 72 To fix this omission, Fraser and Sarwar "suggest that the word ‘theories’ be changed to ‘elements’ to account for the fact that the compatibility criteria apply to theories, methods, and questions alike".p. 72
Different communities can have different compatibility criteria. While some communities may opt to employ the logical law of noncontradiction as their criterion of compatibility, other communities may be more tolerant towards logical inconsistencies. According to Barseghyan, the fact that these days scientists "often simultaneously accept theories which strictly speaking logically contradict each other is a good indication that the actual criteria of compatibility employed by the scientific community might be quite different from the classical logical law of noncontradiction".p. 11 For example, this is apparent in the case of general relativity vs. quantum physics where both theories are accepted as the best available descriptions of their respective domains (i.e. they are considered compatible), but are known to be in conflict when applied simultaneously to such objects as black holes.
Hello world
This is a definition of Method that states "A set of criteria for theory evaluation."
This is an answer to the question Mechanism of Theory Acceptance that states "In order to become accepted into the mosaic, a theory is assessed by the method actually employed at the time."
|
|
|