Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Create the page "Hakob Barseghyan," on this wiki! See also the search results found.
Page title matches
- |First Name=Hakob |Last Name=Barseghyan418 bytes (60 words) - 10:15, 27 April 2024
Page text matches
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Resource=Barseghyan (2018)245 bytes (27 words) - 14:30, 16 January 2023
- |Conclusion=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Premises=Employed Method (Barseghyan-2015)752 bytes (102 words) - 19:15, 20 January 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...redrafted ontology, methods are a species of normative theories.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2018)]]855 bytes (103 words) - 19:40, 10 February 2023
- |Author=Gregory Rupik, Hakob Barseghyan, Jamie Shaw, Paul Patton |Collection=Barseghyan et al. (Eds.) (2022)368 bytes (43 words) - 19:52, 25 December 2021
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...itions are an integral part of the process of scientific change.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2018)]]860 bytes (105 words) - 16:45, 21 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Description=According to Barseghyan, definitions are essentially a species of theories.799 bytes (98 words) - 19:11, 12 January 2023
- |Conclusion=Dogmatism No Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015) ...st Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015)1 KB (159 words) - 10:40, 17 January 2024
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Mathew Mercuri ...)|''Method Hierarchies in Clinical Epidemiology'']].[[CiteRef::Mercuri and Barseghyan (2019)]]2 KB (243 words) - 20:01, 5 February 2023
- |Formulation File=Question Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021).png |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nichole Levesley567 bytes (69 words) - 21:10, 30 July 2021
- |Formulation File=Norm Employment (Barseghyan-2018).png |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan2 KB (213 words) - 20:58, 10 February 2023
- |Authors List=Maxim Mirkin, Hakob Barseghyan, ...19)|The Role of Technological Knowledge in Scientific Change]]''[[CiteRef::Barseghyan and Mirkin (2019)]] and was restated by Mirkin in his ''[[Mirkin (2018)|The1 KB (155 words) - 00:55, 3 September 2019
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan222 bytes (25 words) - 18:33, 19 December 2022
- |Conclusion=Non-Empty Mosaic theorem (Barseghyan-2015) |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015)946 bytes (129 words) - 10:46, 17 January 2024
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Resource=Barseghyan (2022b)429 bytes (58 words) - 20:27, 13 January 2023
- |Authors List=Maxim Mirkin, Hakob Barseghyan, ...19)|The Role of Technological Knowledge in Scientific Change]]''[[CiteRef::Barseghyan and Mirkin (2019)]] and was restated by Mirkin in his ''[[Mirkin (2018)|The1 KB (158 words) - 00:55, 3 September 2019
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...stract method such as "only accept the best available theories".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 220-221]] The latter is another possible instance of a procedural2 KB (244 words) - 14:37, 12 June 2020
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...mpt to describe something. Thus, there are descriptive theories.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 5]]873 bytes (108 words) - 22:14, 19 February 2023
- |Authors List=Maxim Mirkin, Hakob Barseghyan, ...19)|The Role of Technological Knowledge in Scientific Change]]''[[CiteRef::Barseghyan and Mirkin (2019)]] and was restated by Mirkin in his ''[[Mirkin (2018)|The1 KB (160 words) - 00:54, 3 September 2019
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...ions of the epistemic agent. This applies to norms of all types.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2018)]]2 KB (223 words) - 20:32, 10 February 2023
- |Conclusion=Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)855 bytes (115 words) - 10:43, 17 January 2024
- ...sunderstanding, thus their clarification is of great importance.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 30]] |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan2 KB (255 words) - 14:17, 16 January 2023
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Subject=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)1 KB (185 words) - 21:33, 19 January 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nichole Levesley |Formulation File=The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021).png644 bytes (82 words) - 19:36, 2 January 2024
- |Formulation File=The Law of Question Acceptance (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021).png |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nichole Levesley609 bytes (80 words) - 23:39, 29 July 2021
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Description=According to Barseghyan, epistemic agents are an essential part of the process of scientific change816 bytes (105 words) - 15:50, 9 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)604 bytes (72 words) - 23:57, 26 December 2022
- |Conclusion=Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) |Premises=Compatibility Corollary (Fraser-Sarwar-2018), The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)1 KB (149 words) - 10:49, 17 January 2024
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...y accepted its first answer to the question, [[Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015)]], which indicates that the question is itself legitimate.564 bytes (71 words) - 14:49, 30 March 2017
- |Formulation File=Methodology (Barseghyan-2018).png |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,968 bytes (121 words) - 00:12, 3 September 2019
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nichole Levesley |Description=According to Barseghyan and Levesley, questions can have epistemic presuppositions.861 bytes (104 words) - 23:22, 6 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nichole Levesley |Description=According to Barseghyan and Levesley, question can have logical presuppositions.856 bytes (104 words) - 23:33, 6 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)2 KB (199 words) - 18:25, 29 December 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...emic stances]] towards [[Epistemic Element|epistemic elements]].[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2018)]]2 KB (227 words) - 20:32, 2 March 2023
- |Conclusion=Synchronism of Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) |Premises=Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015)1 KB (189 words) - 10:51, 17 January 2024
- |Formulation File=Method (Barseghyan-2018).png |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,1 KB (132 words) - 00:12, 3 September 2019
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...stion became accepted as legitimate with the publication of Barseghyan's [[Barseghyan (2018)|''Redrafting the Ontology of Scientific Change'']].1 KB (141 words) - 19:56, 11 December 2022
- ...Outcomes from Acceptance Unacceptance of Two Contenders (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017).png |Authors List=Paul Patton, Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan,892 bytes (106 words) - 13:22, 1 June 2020
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...acceptance as an epistemic stance can be taken towards theories.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 30-32]]1 KB (165 words) - 19:48, 23 January 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)703 bytes (88 words) - 19:36, 23 January 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)707 bytes (88 words) - 19:37, 23 January 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)710 bytes (88 words) - 14:16, 16 January 2023
- |Authors List=Aayu Pandey, Hakob Barseghyan, Nichole Levesley |Formulation File=Question Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Levesley-Pandey-2023).png618 bytes (74 words) - 23:28, 2 January 2024
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)692 bytes (86 words) - 14:12, 16 January 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...ginal definition of the term was proposed by Barseghyan in 2015.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)]]1 KB (163 words) - 22:53, 11 December 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...which might be different than the accepted methods of the time".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 43]]1 KB (143 words) - 13:45, 5 December 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)685 bytes (85 words) - 14:18, 16 January 2023
- |Author=Hakob Barseghyan354 bytes (42 words) - 17:25, 15 February 2021
- |Conclusion=Contextual Appraisal theorem (Barseghyan-2015) |Premises=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)1 KB (197 words) - 10:52, 17 January 2024
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...ards theories, i.e. an epistemic agent can find a theory useful.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 30-40]]1 KB (158 words) - 19:51, 23 January 2023
- ...comes from Acceptance Unacceptance of a Single Contender (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017).png |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nicholas Overgaard, Paul Patton824 bytes (104 words) - 23:40, 31 May 2020
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...stion, [[Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method (Barseghyan-2015)]], which indicates that the question is itself legitimate.699 bytes (92 words) - 20:53, 5 December 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...eories, i.e. an epistemic agent can find a theory pursuitworthy.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 30-40]]1 KB (160 words) - 19:48, 23 January 2023
- |Subject=The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) |Question=Is the second law suggested by Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan in 2017 a tautology?2 KB (250 words) - 23:02, 19 January 2023
- ...ng Scientific Mosaics: A New Formalization for Theoretical Scientonomy. In Barseghyan et al. (Eds.) (2022), 83-103. ===Barseghyan & Levesley (2021)===4 KB (453 words) - 17:28, 23 February 2024
- |Conclusion=Split Due to Inconclusiveness theorem (Barseghyan-2015) |Premises=Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015)1 KB (217 words) - 10:42, 17 January 2024
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)738 bytes (93 words) - 22:38, 19 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)711 bytes (91 words) - 16:18, 16 February 2017
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Resource=Barseghyan (2018)766 bytes (93 words) - 14:29, 16 January 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)730 bytes (93 words) - 16:14, 16 February 2017
- |Formulation File=Method Hierarchy (Mercuri-Barseghyan-2019).png |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Mathew Mercuri1 KB (174 words) - 00:15, 11 June 2020
- |Authors List=Aayu Pandey, Hakob Barseghyan |Formulation File=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023).png612 bytes (80 words) - 19:44, 2 January 2024
- |Authors List=Jamie Shaw, Hakob Barseghyan, ...e proposed modification becomes accepted by default. According to Shaw and Barseghyan:1 KB (156 words) - 17:47, 29 January 2020
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...Indicators=That's when the first answer to the question, [[Outcome Accept (Barseghyan-2015)]] became accepted, which is an indication that the question itself be1 KB (156 words) - 22:39, 11 December 2022
- |Conclusion=Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)1 KB (168 words) - 10:48, 17 January 2024
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...ntology of Scientific Change'']] where the term was not defined.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2018)]] The first scientonomic definition of the term was provided by [[Pa1 KB (194 words) - 13:20, 10 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)730 bytes (101 words) - 16:18, 16 February 2017
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...ted those theories whose acceptance was permitted by the method.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 53]] Thus, originally ''method employment'' was defined in terms4 KB (520 words) - 20:19, 13 January 2023
- |Subject=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is the first law suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?2 KB (247 words) - 22:32, 19 January 2023
- |Authors List=Aayu Pandey, Hakob Barseghyan |Formulation File=The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023).png634 bytes (83 words) - 19:43, 2 January 2024
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...answer to the question, [[Response to the Argument from Bad Track Record (Barseghyan-2015)]], which indicates that the question is itself legitimate.717 bytes (97 words) - 16:10, 30 March 2017
- |Participants List=Rory Harder, Hakob Barseghyan, Gregory Rupik,257 bytes (36 words) - 19:54, 4 November 2016
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...cators=That's when the first answer to the question, [[Outcome Not Accept (Barseghyan-2015)]] became accepted, which is an indication that the question itself be1 KB (159 words) - 22:42, 11 December 2022
- |Formulation File=Outcome Accept (Barseghyan-2015).png |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,1 KB (180 words) - 18:07, 29 November 2017
- |Authors List=Paul Patton, Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, |Acceptance Indicators=That's when [[Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan (2017)]] became published, which is an indication that the question itself778 bytes (101 words) - 22:44, 11 December 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...tors=That's when the first answer to the question, [[Outcome Inconclusive (Barseghyan-2015)]] became accepted, which is an indication that the question itself be786 bytes (103 words) - 22:41, 11 December 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)729 bytes (97 words) - 16:18, 16 February 2017
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)773 bytes (98 words) - 04:30, 19 January 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...s first answer to the question, [[Synchronism of Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)]], which indicates that the question is itself legitimate.758 bytes (102 words) - 17:34, 16 February 2017
- |Conclusion=Necessary Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015) |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015)2 KB (295 words) - 10:53, 17 January 2024
- |Authors List=Paul Patton, Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, |Acceptance Indicators=That's when [[Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan (2017)]] became published, which is an indication that the question itself786 bytes (103 words) - 22:43, 11 December 2022
- ===Shaw & Barseghyan (2019)=== Shaw, Jamie and Barseghyan, Hakob. (2019) Problems and Prospects with the Scientonomic Workflow. ''Scientonom4 KB (432 words) - 18:39, 29 December 2023
- |Participants List=Felix Walpole, Gregory Rupik, Hakob Barseghyan, Joel Burkholder, Michael Fatigati304 bytes (41 words) - 17:57, 22 September 2020
- |Formulation File=Definition (Barseghyan-2018).png |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan1 KB (143 words) - 23:16, 9 June 2020
- |Formulation File=Outcome Not Accept (Barseghyan-2015).png |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,1 KB (186 words) - 18:07, 29 November 2017
- ...n as indicative of particular methods employed by a given agent.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 117-120]] |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,1 KB (167 words) - 16:37, 16 October 2022
- |Formulation File=Outcome Inconclusive (Barseghyan-2015).png |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,1 KB (183 words) - 18:06, 29 November 2017
- |Formulation File=Outcome Satisfied (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017).png |Authors List=Paul Patton, Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan,989 bytes (130 words) - 20:56, 29 November 2017
- |Conclusion=Sociocultural Factors in Theory Acceptance theorem (Barseghyan-2015) |Title=Deduction of the Sociocultural Factors in Theory Acceptance theorem (Barseghyan-2015)2 KB (233 words) - 19:56, 23 November 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)871 bytes (110 words) - 14:17, 31 May 2020
- |Subject=The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is the first law for methods suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?2 KB (264 words) - 20:21, 3 January 2024
- |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is the first law for theories suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?2 KB (264 words) - 20:24, 3 January 2024
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nichole Levesley |Resource=Barseghyan and Levesley (2021)1 KB (182 words) - 16:01, 28 December 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Acceptance Indicators=This is when [[Barseghyan (2022b)|''Question Pursuit as an Epistemic Stance'']] was published.895 bytes (110 words) - 20:24, 13 January 2023
- |Formulation File=Outcome Inconclusive (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017).png |Authors List=Paul Patton, Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan,1 KB (136 words) - 20:56, 29 November 2017
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nichole Levesley |Formulation File=Logical Presupposition (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021).png1 KB (133 words) - 23:31, 6 February 2023
- |Participants List=Gregory Rupik, Hakob Barseghyan, Mirka Loiselle, Nicholas Overgaard, Sean Cohmer, Zachery Brown, Zoe Sebast343 bytes (47 words) - 17:58, 22 September 2020
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)838 bytes (115 words) - 15:51, 30 March 2017
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...e is only one type of agents that can bear a mosaic - community.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 43-52]] As for ''individual'' epistemic agents, their status and2 KB (222 words) - 15:09, 9 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)1 KB (195 words) - 16:00, 4 July 2017
- |Participants List=Andrew Chung, Deivide Garcia, Hakob Barseghyan, Jamie Shaw, Juan Serrano Reyes, Kye Palider, Landon See, Letizia Marcelja,355 bytes (46 words) - 16:28, 9 December 2023
- |Formulation File=Outcome Not Satisfied (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017).png |Authors List=Paul Patton, Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan,1,016 bytes (136 words) - 20:55, 29 November 2017
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nichole Levesley |Formulation File=Epistemic Presupposition (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021).png1 KB (140 words) - 23:20, 6 February 2023
- ...t=Alexander Offord, Cameron Scott, Carlin Henikoff, Cyrus Al-Zayadi, Hakob Barseghyan, Jamie Shaw, Joshua Allen, Kye Palider, Paul Patton, Tessa Ng, Zoë Golay353 bytes (46 words) - 18:40, 11 September 2021
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...accepted only when their acceptance is permitted by the method. [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 53]] ''The second law'' of theory acceptance is a direct consequ1 KB (205 words) - 18:03, 29 November 2017
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Mathew Mercuri ...e publication of [[Mercuri and Barseghyan (2019)|the paper]] by Mercuri & Barseghyan.1 KB (161 words) - 20:41, 5 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)1 KB (185 words) - 16:02, 4 July 2017
- |Participants List=Cyrus Al-Zayadi, Hakob Barseghyan, Kaden McKeen, Kye Palider, Neo Yin, Nichole Levesley, Paul Patton, Sanghoo363 bytes (49 words) - 15:39, 1 October 2020
- |Participants List=Hakob Barseghyan, Paul Patton, Maxim Mirkin, Calahan Janik-Jones, Ameer Sarwar, Patrick Fras385 bytes (50 words) - 21:20, 11 February 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Mathew Mercuri ...e publication of [[Mercuri and Barseghyan (2019)|the paper]] by Mercuri & Barseghyan.1 KB (166 words) - 02:35, 10 June 2020
- |Formulation File=Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2018).png |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,1 KB (158 words) - 00:01, 3 September 2019
- |Formulation File=Scientific Mosaic (Barseghyan-2018).png |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,2 KB (207 words) - 20:43, 10 February 2023
- ...a Castino, Amirali Atrli, Deivide Garcia, G. G. Shan, Gregory Rupik, Hakob Barseghyan, Izzy Friesen, Jamie Shaw, Juan Serrano Reyes, Kye Palider, Paul Patton, Re373 bytes (49 words) - 18:40, 29 December 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Formulation File=Method (Barseghyan-2015).png2 KB (211 words) - 19:59, 3 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)927 bytes (125 words) - 01:14, 6 December 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...nclude employed methods, whether they are explicit or implicit. [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015) |pp. 52-61]]2 KB (219 words) - 14:29, 7 July 2017
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nichole Levesley423 bytes (53 words) - 17:21, 30 July 2021
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...ity accepted its first answer to the question, [[Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)]], which indicates that the question is itself legitimate.1,000 bytes (135 words) - 20:46, 26 February 2023
- ...lah Sarwar, Georgiana Dusa, Intishar Kazi, Kye Palider, Paul Patton, Hakob Barseghyan, Yichen Zhang, Sinan Karamehmetoglu, Andy Jiao, Spenser Borrie,401 bytes (54 words) - 12:29, 11 October 2018
- ...inclusive workflow with clearly stated epistemic goals.[[CiteRef::Shaw and Barseghyan (2019)]] Thus, it is vital for the success of scientonomy as an academic fi |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nicholas Overgaard, Paul Patton, Gregory Rupik,1 KB (172 words) - 13:37, 6 February 2020
- |Formulation File=Theory Assessment Outcomes (Barseghyan-2015).png |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,2 KB (265 words) - 18:05, 29 November 2017
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...e Indicators=That is when the first definition of the term, [[Methodology (Barseghyan-2015)]] became accepted, which is a good indication that the question itsel999 bytes (137 words) - 22:05, 11 December 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Formulation File=Scientific Change Barseghyan 2015.png2 KB (250 words) - 20:54, 3 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...citly draw the distinction.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 33]] [[CiteRef::Barseghyan and Shaw (2017)]]3 KB (437 words) - 20:19, 23 January 2023
- ...in Henikoff, Cyrus Al-Zayadi, Deivide Garcia, Guillaume Dechauffour, Hakob Barseghyan, Hannah Rajput, Izzy Friesen, Jamie Shaw, Joshua Allen, Kye Palider, Paul P434 bytes (56 words) - 16:13, 10 October 2021
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)961 bytes (120 words) - 23:57, 15 February 2017
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...quantum mechanics and, yet, we do not hesitate to accept both. [[CiteRef::Barseghyan(2015)|p. 5]]2 KB (270 words) - 20:37, 3 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...nclusive outcome ("''can''" be accepted") is also conceivable. [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 200]]1 KB (172 words) - 17:39, 16 February 2017
- |First Name=Hakob |Last Name=Barseghyan418 bytes (60 words) - 10:15, 27 April 2024
- ...ard, Paul Patton, Jacob MacKinnon, Jacqueline Sereda, Gregory Rupik, Hakob Barseghyan, Markus Alliksaar, Calahan Janik-Jones, William Rawleigh, Terese Pierre, Na460 bytes (59 words) - 12:59, 15 April 2017
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)1,006 bytes (130 words) - 23:12, 11 February 2023
- |Authors List=Mathew Mercuri, Hakob Barseghyan,429 bytes (59 words) - 20:04, 5 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)944 bytes (122 words) - 02:12, 27 January 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...epted at the time, and which methods were employed at the time. [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 12]] This process is the concern of historical (empirical) quest1 KB (186 words) - 16:14, 16 February 2017
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nichole Levesley |Acceptance Indicators=This is when Barseghyan and Levesley's [[Barseghyan and Levesley (2021)|''Question Dynamics'']] that offered a definition of th1 KB (168 words) - 23:36, 6 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)1,002 bytes (133 words) - 04:04, 16 February 2017
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Author=Hakob Barseghyan,2 KB (320 words) - 21:29, 16 October 2022
- |Conclusion=Dynamic Substantive Methods theorem (Barseghyan-2015) |Premises=Synchronism of Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015), Fallibilism2 KB (277 words) - 10:54, 17 January 2024
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...er to the question was accepted, the [[Dogmatism No Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015)]], indicating that the question is itself legitimate.1 KB (144 words) - 16:55, 16 February 2017
- |Author=Hakob Barseghyan |VideoDescription=Hakob Barseghyan presenting the redrafted ontology2 KB (243 words) - 21:30, 2 June 2020
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...re it may be fulfilled in many ways and allows underdeterminism [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 198]].1 KB (186 words) - 15:49, 16 February 2017
- ...accepted theory to another and one employed method to another, [[CiteRef:: Barseghyan (2015) | p. 107]] it is not clear what methodology should act as a normativ |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,2 KB (225 words) - 18:53, 15 February 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...ommunity accepted its first definition of the term, [[Acceptance Criteria (Barseghyan-2015)]].1 KB (142 words) - 19:40, 11 December 2022
- |Authors List=Paul Patton, Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, ...sed by a method, one of the three following outcomes can obtain:[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 199]]2 KB (248 words) - 20:47, 12 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nichole Levesley486 bytes (64 words) - 17:18, 30 July 2021
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...e from other employed methods and accepted theories of the time.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 226]]2 KB (252 words) - 18:46, 23 November 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nichole Levesley |Acceptance Indicators=This is when Barseghyan and Levesley's [[Barseghyan and Levesley (2021)|''Question Dynamics'']] that offered a definition of th1 KB (176 words) - 23:37, 6 February 2023
- ...understanding, thus their clarification is of great importance. [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 30]] Thus, distinguishing between these terms is of great importa |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan1 KB (154 words) - 19:40, 9 January 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,609 bytes (80 words) - 23:25, 11 December 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,602 bytes (81 words) - 22:08, 11 December 2022
- |Conclusion=Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) |Premises=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)2 KB (352 words) - 10:57, 17 January 2024
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)2 KB (273 words) - 16:11, 6 July 2017
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,591 bytes (80 words) - 22:05, 11 December 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...ted an answer to this question, Assessment of Scientonomy - Relevant facts Barseghyan 2015, and this implies the acceptance of the legitimacy of the question its1 KB (156 words) - 18:48, 25 July 2017
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...of the [[Modification:Sciento-2018-0008|acceptance]] of [[Norm Employment (Barseghyan-2018)|the first definition of the term]].1 KB (151 words) - 14:22, 16 January 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...thers neglected and why some are used and others remain unused. [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015) |p. 42]]2 KB (345 words) - 16:54, 11 January 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)2 KB (240 words) - 15:59, 4 July 2017
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...ot required'' to account for the process of theory construction.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 29]]3 KB (497 words) - 16:04, 4 July 2017
- ...t was originally intended by [[Rory Harder|Harder]] and [[Hakob Barseghyan|Barseghyan]] - the idea that two elements are compatible when they can coexist within1 KB (148 words) - 03:02, 4 June 2020
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...ristotelian requirements of "intuition schooled by experience").[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 199-200]]2 KB (213 words) - 14:40, 28 September 2016
- ...2015)|the original definition of the term]] proposed by [[Hakob Barseghyan|Barseghyan]] to ensure that the term is applicable not only to ''descriptive'' theorie1 KB (203 words) - 23:31, 10 June 2020
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nichole Levesley |Acceptance Indicators=This is when Barseghyan and Levesley's [[Barseghyan and Levesley (2021)|''Question Dynamics'']] that offered an answer to the q2 KB (209 words) - 23:24, 2 January 2024
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Formulation File=The First Law Barseghyan 2015.png4 KB (564 words) - 00:03, 28 February 2024
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan702 bytes (88 words) - 21:33, 11 December 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nicholas Overgaard, Paul Patton686 bytes (85 words) - 20:22, 17 December 2022
- |Authors List=Jamie Shaw, Hakob Barseghyan, |Acceptance Indicators=The publication of [[Shaw and Barseghyan (2019)]] is and indication of the acceptance of the question.1 KB (157 words) - 00:33, 29 January 2020
- |Authors List=Jamie Shaw, Hakob Barseghyan, |Acceptance Indicators=The publication of Shaw and Barseghyan (2019) is and indication of the acceptance of the question.1 KB (155 words) - 00:05, 29 January 2020
- ...e, i.e. methods without which no change in a mosaic is possible.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 226-233]] |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan2 KB (228 words) - 17:10, 22 January 2023
- ...ist=Gregory Rupik, Paul Patton, Nicholas Overgaard, Jacob MacKinnon, Hakob Barseghyan, Jacqueline Sereda, Mirka Loiselle, Zachery Brown, Mathew Mercuri, Jennifer520 bytes (73 words) - 00:04, 8 March 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)1 KB (165 words) - 20:46, 6 November 2023
- |Authors List=Maxim Mirkin, Hakob Barseghyan,634 bytes (85 words) - 21:52, 11 December 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)1 KB (172 words) - 13:08, 13 September 2019
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...cepted its first answer to this question, Indicators of Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan 2015), which indicates that the question is itself considered legitimate.1 KB (175 words) - 16:48, 16 October 2022
- |Authors List=Jamie Shaw, Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Shaw and Barseghyan (2019)1 KB (166 words) - 19:20, 3 March 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...theory is considered as revealing the final and absolute truth".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 165]]3 KB (420 words) - 20:36, 10 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nichole Levesley ...publication of [[Barseghyan and Levesley (2021)|''Question Dynamics'']] by Barseghyan and Levesley where the first law for questions was formulated is a solid in2 KB (220 words) - 18:29, 2 January 2024
- |Authors List=Jamie Shaw, Hakob Barseghyan, ...ch also addresses the problem of lack of commenting. As stated by Shaw and Barseghyan:2 KB (312 words) - 17:11, 29 January 2020
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan781 bytes (101 words) - 22:45, 11 December 2022
- |Formulation File=The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017).png |Authors List=Paul Patton, Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan,3 KB (498 words) - 14:38, 16 February 2024
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Formulation File=Theory (Barseghyan-2015).png2 KB (334 words) - 20:05, 3 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...es not undermine the possibility of the theory of scientific change (TSC). Barseghyan shows that each of the theses lead to bizarre implications that form threat5 KB (710 words) - 00:14, 5 December 2018
- The project was first announced by [[Hakob Barseghyan]] on 15 January 2016. |description=Hakob Barseghyan announces ''The Tree of Knowledge'' project3 KB (494 words) - 11:52, 12 August 2019
- ...discussions such that they do not extend indefinitely."[[CiteRef::Shaw and Barseghyan (2019)]] Thus, it is important for the scientonomic workflow to have a prop |Authors List=Jamie Shaw, Hakob Barseghyan,2 KB (259 words) - 16:57, 29 January 2020
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan839 bytes (102 words) - 16:19, 21 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,707 bytes (97 words) - 19:35, 7 October 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...s separate domains of knowledge, but as part of the same mosaic.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 111]]3 KB (411 words) - 18:52, 25 July 2017
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...ty accepted its first answer to the question, [[The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015)]], which indicates that the questions is itself considered legitimate1 KB (192 words) - 14:54, 4 October 2023
- |Author=Hakob Barseghyan, Paul Patton, Gregory Rupik, Jamie Shaw |Cover Image=Barseghyan.H.Patton.P.Rupik.G.Shaw.J.(Eds.) Scientonomy.2022.png2 KB (359 words) - 05:31, 3 December 2021
- ...Pursuit|pursuitworthy]] by the editors and reviewers? As noted by Shaw and Barseghyan, ...ey merely search for stimulating and interesting ideas.[[CiteRef::Shaw and Barseghyan (2019)|p. 3]]</blockquote>2 KB (322 words) - 22:57, 28 January 2020
- |Authors List=Maxim Mirkin, Hakob Barseghyan,811 bytes (109 words) - 20:34, 11 December 2022
- ...nge, when it is permitted by the employed method of that mosaic.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 239]] ...This is a case of indirect influence from sociocultural factors.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 240]]4 KB (600 words) - 05:02, 11 January 2018
- |Authors List=Paul Patton, Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, |Formulation File=Employed Method (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017).png4 KB (646 words) - 20:20, 13 January 2023
- |Authors List=Maxim Mirkin, Hakob Barseghyan,868 bytes (119 words) - 21:40, 11 December 2022
- |Authors List=Maxim Mirkin, Hakob Barseghyan,890 bytes (121 words) - 20:38, 11 December 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...cs, despite the fact that both are accepted parts of the mosaic.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)| p. 5]]6 KB (799 words) - 19:20, 10 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...the community accepted its first answer to the question, [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]], which indicates that the questions is itself considered legitimate2 KB (214 words) - 23:32, 21 February 2023
- |Conclusion=Static Procedural Methods theorem (Barseghyan-2015) |Premises=Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)4 KB (525 words) - 10:56, 17 January 2024
- |Authors List=Maxim Mirkin, Hakob Barseghyan,907 bytes (120 words) - 00:56, 3 September 2019
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) |Subject=The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)4 KB (458 words) - 21:54, 19 January 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,918 bytes (122 words) - 19:58, 11 December 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...the community accepted its first answer to the question, [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]], which indicates that the questions is itself considered legitimate2 KB (229 words) - 23:24, 21 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,943 bytes (124 words) - 19:51, 11 December 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Formulation File=The First Law for Methods Barseghyan 2015.jpg4 KB (541 words) - 13:07, 19 January 2024
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)4 KB (529 words) - 17:41, 24 February 2023
- |Author=Hakob Barseghyan, Jamie Shaw |Collection=Barseghyan et al. (Eds.) (2022)2 KB (233 words) - 22:27, 24 December 2021
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan1 KB (132 words) - 14:14, 16 January 2023
- |Authors List=Jennifer Whyte, Hakob Barseghyan,1 KB (140 words) - 17:36, 16 February 2017
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan1 KB (137 words) - 22:09, 19 February 2023
- |Author=Hakob Barseghyan, Nicholas Overgaard, Gregory Rupik1 KB (147 words) - 16:11, 15 April 2021
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...'' of certain theories, and not just on the theories themselves.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p.203]]5 KB (761 words) - 17:32, 31 October 2023
- |Conclusion=Theory (Barseghyan-2015) |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan2 KB (332 words) - 19:43, 3 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan1 KB (149 words) - 21:31, 16 October 2022
- ...point out that [[Hakob Barseghyan|Barseghyan]]'s [[Compatibility Criteria (Barseghyan-2015)|original definition]] of the term "excludes a simple point that is as ...e different from the classical logical law of noncontradiction".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 11]] For example, this is apparent in the case of general relativ3 KB (442 words) - 15:41, 12 October 2020
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Author=Hakob Barseghyan,4 KB (592 words) - 12:11, 4 June 2020
- ...quired modification before they were compatible with each other.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 159-161]] What conditions allow for the coexistence of elements, |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Rory Harder5 KB (686 words) - 20:39, 26 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...of the process of scientific change.[[CiteRef::Rawleigh (2018)]][[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2018)]][[CiteRef::Fraser and Sarwar (2018)]][[CiteRef::Sarwar and Fraser (2 KB (272 words) - 16:59, 26 January 2023
- |Authors List=Jamie Shaw, Hakob Barseghyan, As put by Shaw and Barseghyan:3 KB (426 words) - 19:15, 5 March 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,1 KB (148 words) - 18:42, 17 February 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...uestions are descriptive in nature, and the third is normative. [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 12-13]]4 KB (641 words) - 21:46, 19 February 2023
- ...epted as the best available theory by the scientific community. [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 40]] ...in terms of their acceptance status in the scientific community [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 30]].4 KB (589 words) - 17:31, 23 September 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan1 KB (144 words) - 16:36, 21 February 2023
- ...distinctive perspectives that one might take towards a theory. [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015) |pp. 21-30]] Ought scientonomy deal with the process of theory const |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan4 KB (555 words) - 21:30, 16 October 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...not necessarily indicate]] the ''employed method'' of the time. [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 53-54]]3 KB (403 words) - 19:33, 25 July 2017
- ...n=According to Hakob Barseghyan in The Laws of Scientific Change[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 235]] the process of scientific change is affected by sociocultur ...umstance is sometimes referred to as the “High Priest” scenario.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 235-236]]6 KB (959 words) - 05:01, 11 January 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan1 KB (160 words) - 15:43, 23 January 2023
- |Authors List=Karl Loszak, Terese Pierre, Hakob Barseghyan,1 KB (159 words) - 16:53, 9 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...ses specifically within the context of the ontology assumed by the current Barseghyan [[Theory of Scientific Change|theory of scientific change]], and the defini3 KB (429 words) - 17:21, 20 October 2022
- ...ject, does this mean that the object is a bearer of a [[Scientific Mosaic (Barseghyan-2015)|mosaic]]? In addition, it seems as though that at times a community c |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nicholas Overgaard2 KB (294 words) - 16:51, 9 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ..., university curricula and the minutes of association meetings. [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)| pp. 113-117]]3 KB (491 words) - 20:24, 25 July 2017
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, This theorem follows from [[The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015)|former description of the third law]], which states that a method bec5 KB (761 words) - 21:41, 1 April 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Charlotte Brown, Liron Cohen,1 KB (182 words) - 18:14, 12 March 2018
- |Authors List=Paul Patton, Hakob Barseghyan,1 KB (165 words) - 19:01, 21 March 2017
- |Authors List=Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, Markus Alliksaar, Paul Patton,1 KB (175 words) - 16:53, 9 February 2023
- |Authors List=Cameron Martin, Hakob Barseghyan,1 KB (179 words) - 17:22, 8 February 2018
- |Authors List=Karen Yan, Jamie Shaw, Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Shaw and Barseghyan (2019)2 KB (281 words) - 19:48, 3 March 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan1 KB (183 words) - 13:59, 29 December 2022
- |Author=Hakob Barseghyan ...epistemic agents (Laudan 1977; Wykstra 1980; Whitt 1990; Achinstein 1993; Barseghyan & Shaw 2017). Since a theory can be conceived as an attempt to answer a que2 KB (339 words) - 19:22, 20 June 2022
- ...questions, theoretical questions, and methodological questions [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 12]]. Historical questions deal with actual courses of events su |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan6 KB (817 words) - 21:30, 16 October 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Formulation File=The Second Law Barseghyan 2015.png9 KB (1,286 words) - 17:07, 27 January 2023
- |Author=Jamie Shaw, Hakob Barseghyan,1 KB (206 words) - 19:05, 25 January 2020
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...important precursors to Scientonomy.[[CiteRef::Laudan (1984a)]][[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)]]7 KB (906 words) - 11:22, 14 February 2024
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan2 KB (212 words) - 22:17, 19 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nicholas Overgaard, Paul Patton, Gregory Rupik, |Resource=Shaw and Barseghyan (2019)5 KB (657 words) - 20:30, 29 November 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...in both, so that the differences between the two are resolved".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 214]]5 KB (737 words) - 22:07, 10 November 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan2 KB (215 words) - 16:40, 21 February 2023
- |Author=Paul Patton, Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan,1 KB (211 words) - 01:13, 6 November 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,1 KB (200 words) - 22:02, 6 October 2018
- |Author=Hakob Barseghyan, Jamie Shaw,1 KB (200 words) - 16:13, 12 November 2017
- ...to be a scientific change as described by the [[Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)|Theory Rejection Theorem]] be a violation of the laws of scientific c |Authors List=Paul Patton, Hakob Barseghyan, Liron Cohen, Calahan Janik-Jones,2 KB (353 words) - 01:33, 3 September 2019
- |Authors List=Ameer Sarwar, Hakob Barseghyan, Sinan Karamehmetoglu1 KB (185 words) - 17:26, 16 October 2022
- |Authors List=Christopher Kaumeyer, Hakob Barseghyan,1 KB (205 words) - 07:00, 7 March 2018
- |Authors List=Aayu Pandey, Hakob Barseghyan |Formulation File=Theory Rejection Theorem (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023).png8 KB (1,213 words) - 23:13, 2 January 2024
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...mosaic split must then occur, as a matter of logical necessity.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 204-207]]6 KB (876 words) - 20:12, 6 November 2023
- |Author=Hakob Barseghyan |Cover Image=Barseghyan.H The.Laws.of.Scientific.Change.2015.png2 KB (232 words) - 00:54, 3 June 2020
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...whether he ascribed different meanings to at least some of them.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 30]]8 KB (1,169 words) - 11:25, 13 February 2024
- |Author=Mathew Mercuri, Hakob Barseghyan,2 KB (215 words) - 19:14, 25 January 2020
- |Authors List=Jamie Shaw, Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Shaw and Barseghyan (2019)3 KB (366 words) - 15:45, 4 March 2023
- |Author=Kye Palider, Paul Patton, Hakob Barseghyan, Julia Da Silva, Torin Doppelt, Nichole Levesley, Jessica Rapson, Ameer Sar2 KB (209 words) - 15:41, 3 February 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Patrick Fraser1 KB (199 words) - 03:00, 17 October 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Patrick Fraser, Calahan Janik-Jones,1 KB (204 words) - 16:54, 9 February 2023
- |Author=Izzy Friesen, Joshua Allen, Markus Alliksaar, Amirali Atrli, Hakob Barseghyan, Spenser Borrie, Alessandra Castino, Deivide Garcia, Rebecca Muscant, Tessa2 KB (198 words) - 18:20, 1 January 2024
- ...n Interpretation is currently accepted.[[CiteRef::Faye (2014)]] [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 202]] Such contender theories are said to be [[Theory Pursuit|pur |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,7 KB (959 words) - 18:23, 26 February 2023
- |Authors List=Abdullah Sarwar, Hakob Barseghyan, Intishar Kazi1 KB (217 words) - 14:13, 29 December 2022
- |Author=Hakob Barseghyan2 KB (210 words) - 16:27, 21 September 2021
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...mpatibility with the propositions of the newly accepted theory".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 168]] If it turns out that a previously accepted theory is compat8 KB (1,153 words) - 16:47, 24 February 2023
- ...entific change is not possible if science is a social construct [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 89]]. |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,6 KB (863 words) - 00:04, 5 December 2018
- ...scussed the role of the external factors on theory construction.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 233]] In 1970, [[Imre Lakatos]] suggested that what constitutes a ...factors are factors are internal to science and which external.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 234]] However, he argues that if we were to define ''sociocultura5 KB (636 words) - 23:23, 11 December 2022
- |Author=Hakob Barseghyan, Nichole Levesley2 KB (242 words) - 16:37, 1 August 2021
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...ity accepted its first answer to the question, [[Non-Empty Mosaic theorem (Barseghyan-2015)|the Non-Empty Mosaic theorem]], which indicates that the question is3 KB (386 words) - 22:21, 21 January 2023
- |Author=Hakob Barseghyan2 KB (243 words) - 19:22, 20 June 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...ntize general relativity, to create a quantum theory of gravity.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 40]]7 KB (946 words) - 22:05, 19 December 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...of the scientific mosaic accepted by the scientific community. [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 43]] And thus, we can conclude that the social level is essential4 KB (545 words) - 23:19, 11 December 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Formulation File=Asynchronism of Method Employment theorem (Barseghyan-2015).png6 KB (871 words) - 20:34, 3 February 2023
- |Author=Hakob Barseghyan, Maxim Mirkin,2 KB (237 words) - 13:55, 4 January 2019
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...y as any set of propositions that attempt to describe something.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)]] As such, this definition excluded normative propositions. In early4 KB (566 words) - 19:35, 12 January 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...eghyan's [[The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015)|original third law]].[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 54]] In that formulation, it wasn't clear whether employed method5 KB (708 words) - 11:32, 14 February 2024
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...nor obliged to provide an account of pursuit in an actual TSC".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 41]]4 KB (658 words) - 17:21, 20 October 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...e different from the classical logical law of noncontradiction".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 11]] For example, this is apparent in the case of general relativ6 KB (809 words) - 19:52, 10 February 2023
- |Authors List=Charlotte Marcotte-Toale, Hakob Barseghyan, Paul Patton2 KB (297 words) - 17:21, 16 October 2022
- ...scientific community is unsettled. [[Methodology Can Shape Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015)]] states that a methodology can influence employed methods, if its re |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,4 KB (600 words) - 10:01, 17 March 2018
- ...e from other employed methods and accepted theories of the time.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p.132]] In that formulation, it wasn't clear whether employed method In all other respects, this formulation preserves the gist of Barseghyan's original formulation. According to the third law, a method becomes employ8 KB (1,168 words) - 17:24, 7 May 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...employed by these agents to evaluate them ''change over time''.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 217-225]] As the empirical scientific study of this process of s10 KB (1,501 words) - 18:14, 11 February 2024
- ...[Barseghyan et al. (Eds.) (2022)|in a collected edited volume]].[[CiteRef::Barseghyan et al. (Eds.) (2022)]] ...Andrea Roselli, David Stump, Deivide Garcia, Guillaume Dechauffour, Hakob Barseghyan, Hasok Chang, Jamie Shaw, Jessica Rapson, Julia Da Silva, Justin Donhauser,4 KB (586 words) - 19:06, 24 December 2021
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...ady employed method cannot possibly lead to a method rejection."[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 174]]14 KB (2,079 words) - 19:13, 24 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...which it follows that methods and theories change synchronously.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 151]]5 KB (663 words) - 14:01, 17 March 2018
- ...o do with implicit rules actually employed in theory assessment.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 52]] Many philosophers and historians of science have argued that |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan5 KB (785 words) - 21:30, 16 October 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...As a result, the language of “external” factors is problematic.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)]]6 KB (894 words) - 19:53, 23 November 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,2 KB (308 words) - 21:48, 11 December 2022
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)4 KB (562 words) - 22:15, 10 November 2023
- ...s constitute progress [[CiteRef:: Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 12-21]][[CiteRef:: Barseghyan and Shaw (2019)]]. The question at issue is whether the descriptive laws un |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,5 KB (783 words) - 19:40, 12 December 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)5 KB (687 words) - 07:15, 7 December 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...the thesis of fallibilism is assumed and paraconsistent logic is applied. Barseghyan suggests that the question as to whether methods change or not amounts to a7 KB (1,031 words) - 15:05, 4 July 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...n was replaced by a [[Method (Barseghyan-2018)|new definition]].[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2018)]]6 KB (850 words) - 18:45, 9 January 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Formulation File=The Third Law Barseghyan 2015.png18 KB (2,630 words) - 15:49, 4 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |Formulation File=The First Law for Theories Barseghyan 2015.jpg12 KB (1,712 words) - 17:12, 2 November 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...lato or Aristotle.[[CiteRef::Laudan (1984a)|pp. 5, 11, 25, 33]] [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 197]] According to Laudan, most philosophers subscribed to scient6 KB (922 words) - 02:24, 14 March 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...answer to the question, [[Response to the Argument from Nothing Permanent (Barseghyan-2015)]], which indicates that the question is itself legitimate.5 KB (753 words) - 20:55, 5 December 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...e whole enterprise of scientific change to take off the ground".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 228]]12 KB (1,835 words) - 19:46, 23 November 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...on can also be inferred as a theorem from the axioms of the TSC.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 196-198]]7 KB (1,073 words) - 21:37, 11 March 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...ch indicates that the question is itself considered legitimate. [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015) |pp. 61-72]]5 KB (781 words) - 19:36, 30 November 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...s that "that nowadays we take the comparative view for granted".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 184]]7 KB (949 words) - 19:22, 24 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |Resource=Barseghyan (2015)5 KB (761 words) - 22:20, 10 November 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...ators=While, in this general form, the question wasn't clearly stated in [[Barseghyan (2015)|''The Laws of Scientific Change'']], it was implicit in a more speci5 KB (671 words) - 17:12, 27 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,3 KB (442 words) - 17:47, 22 January 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...question that emerged in the 20th century, and is certainly not unique to Barseghyan’s Laws of Scientific Change. The topic is typically tied up in discussion5 KB (684 words) - 05:30, 11 January 2018
- |Authors List=Jennifer Whyte, Hakob Barseghyan, Jacob MacKinnon,4 KB (581 words) - 22:44, 5 February 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, ...e assessment outcome of at least one of the contender theories".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 208]]21 KB (3,194 words) - 21:45, 10 November 2023
- ...ompatibility between accepted theories and employed methods".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)||pp.157]] Importantly, the Zeroth Law extends only to theories and m ...law of compatibility'', they cannot be simultaneously employed".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)||pp.163]]21 KB (3,113 words) - 20:16, 10 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,4 KB (602 words) - 21:51, 5 December 2018
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan4 KB (598 words) - 18:55, 10 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...rativist view that is implicit in the laws of scientific change.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 184]] </blockquote>22 KB (3,339 words) - 17:13, 31 October 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...ty accepted its first answer to this question, [[Theory Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)]], which indicates that the question is itself legitimate.7 KB (1,049 words) - 19:29, 3 January 2024
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Kevin Zheng ...as raised in 2016. In 2018, the term epistemic agent was coined,[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2018)]] which led to the rephrasing of the question as an ontological ques10 KB (1,480 words) - 15:02, 9 February 2023
- |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan ...e adopted as part of the Barseghyan theory of scientific change.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)]]9 KB (1,276 words) - 20:41, 26 February 2023
- |Authors List=Gregory Rupik, Hakob Barseghyan, Nicholas Overgaard, Paul Patton ...ined in the first section of ''The Laws of Scientific Change'', [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 3-123]] which deals with metatheoretical issues. These include t16 KB (2,219 words) - 08:19, 11 February 2024
- ...f the Cambridge curriculum, as they also would in Paris by 1700.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 190]] When Newton published his magnum opus, the ''Principia'' i ...he middle of the eighteenth century. [[CiteRef::Janiak (2016)]] [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 211-212]][[CiteRef::Aiton (1958)|p. 172]][[CiteRef::Frangsmyr (119 KB (2,653 words) - 02:03, 15 March 2018
- ...ories and by the later theories of [[Isaac Newton]] (1642-1726).[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 167]] ...erience, or if it is deduced from general intuitive principles”.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 144]] Descartes became frustrated with this tradition and its dia27 KB (3,968 words) - 02:04, 15 March 2018